
Brendan C. Austin, General Attorney in Washington, District of Columbia
Over 8 years of legal practice
AssociateatMotley Rice LLC
Washington, DC
Practicing general in Washington since 2018.
- 8+
- Years practicing
- 1
- Bar admission
Practices in
Are you Brendan C. Austin?
This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.
Quick answer
Brendan C. Austin is an associate based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on General. Brendan has over 8 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Motley Rice LLC.
- Based in
- Washington, DC
- Experience
- over 8 years
- Known for
- General
- Handles General matters from Washington, DC.
- Over 8 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
About Brendan C. Austin: Brendan C. Austin is an associate based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on General. Brendan has over 8 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Motley Rice LLC.
Areas of practice
Brendan's practice areas in Washington
Brendan concentrates on general. Each area below outlines the kind of case Brendan handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.
General cases in Washington, District of Columbia
Brendan takes general matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Brendan agrees to represent you.
Biography
Brendan C. Austin, general attorney serving Washington
Brendan C. Austin is an associate based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on General. Brendan has over 8 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Motley Rice LLC. Brendan works from Washington, District of Columbia and takes on general matters across the region.
Brendan Austin works to combat consumer fraud and protects public resources and interests through litigation filed for clients in the public sector.
Brendan is part of the firm’s team representing government entities in litigation targeting opioid manufacturers, distributors, and dispensing pharmacies for their alleged misrepresentation and over-distribution of these highly addictive prescription painkillers. Additionally, he represents the City of Chicago in a first-of-its-kind lawsuit seeking to hold a gun manufacturer accountable for selling, manufacturing, and marketing pistols that they allegedly knew or should have known could be easily modified to machine guns by using switches.
Brendan’s past casework has included representing multiple state attorneys general in litigation against the Takata Corporation and automakers for allegedly using deceptive practices to put dangerous airbags into millions of vehicles in the United States. He was a member of the firm’s litigation team representing the Mississippi Attorney General against subprime auto lenders for allegedly fraudulent lending and collection practices. Brendan was also a member of the firm’s team representing the City of Chicago in its lawsuit against e-cigarette manufacturer JUUL, alleging unfair and deceptive marketing and sales practices.
Prior to joining Motley Rice, Brendan practiced at a sizeable D.C. law firm where he focused on investigations and lawsuits involving consumer protection, false claims litigation, and fraudulent and deceptive trade practices for attorneys general and other public sector clients. Among other matters, he was part of a team that represented attorneys general in litigation against several nursing home chains for allegedly using deceptive marketing to increase their profits while failing to provide basic care to their elderly residents.
While pursuing his law degree, Brendan clerked for a law firm in California, completing research for complex litigation involving securities fraud and false claims. He also interned for the University of San Diego Civil Clinic, in addition to assisting with pro bono domestic violence and humanitarian cases at Casa Cornelia Law Center in San Diego.
Blog Posts
September 29, 2022
Children say Instagram worsens their mental health Causes, Not Just Cases
by: Previn Warren
July 26, 2022
Nearly $4.25 billion Teva settlement a sign opioid litigation strategy is working to abate the crisis, help communities recover Causes, Not Just Cases
by: Joseph F. Rice
February 25, 2022
Significant opioid relief finally on the way Causes, Not Just Cases
by: Joseph F. Rice
News
March 25, 2026
New Mexico AG Prevails in Lawsuit Against Meta Platforms Inc.
by: Motley Rice
April 28, 2025
The history and legacy of Workers’ Memorial Day
by:
M. Nolan Webb
How Brendan handles general matters
Brendan Austin works to combat consumer fraud and protects public resources and interests through litigation filed for clients in the public sector. Brendan is part of the firm’s team representing government entities in litigation targeting opioid manufacturers, distributors, and dispensing pharmacies for their alleged misrepresentation and over-distribution of these highly addictive prescription…
The kind of cases Brendan takes
Brendan reviews new inquiries case-by-case for general matters in Washington and the surrounding District of Columbia area.
Credentials
Credentials — where Brendan studied and practices
University of San Diego School of Law
J.D. · 2014
Biola University
B.A. · 2008
Jurisdictions
Brendan's state bar admissions
Hawaii
2018 · ACTIVE
Brendan studied at J.D. in University of San Diego School of Law and B.A. in Biola University.
Law school and academic background
Brendan completed J.D. in University of San Diego School of Law and B.A. in Biola University. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Brendan runs in District of Columbia is where that training gets applied to real client questions.
Locations
Brendan C. Austin's office in Washington
Brendan's primary office is at 401 9th St., NW, Suite 1001, Washington, DC, 20007. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.
Client feedback
Client reviews of Brendan C. Austin
Brendan has not yet collected verified client reviews on LawyersListed. Reviews here are all from confirmed clients; anonymous ratings are moderated out.
No reviews yet
Only verified clients who have consulted with Brendan C. Austin can leave a review.
Schedule your consultationHiring guide
How to hire Brendan C. Austin — what to expect in your first consultation
Working with a new general attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Brendan usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.
Consultation formats and pricing
Brendan charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Brendan's office.
What to bring to your first meeting
Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Brendan will tell you what matters and what doesn't.
Questions to ask a general attorney in Washington, District of Columbia
A short list to run through before you commit: How many general matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?
Fees & payment
Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Brendan
Brendan discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in general practice — ask which fits.
Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options
Every general matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Brendan confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.
Payment methods and payment plans
Brendan's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many general practices work with clients on structured schedules.
Frequently asked
Frequently asked questions about Brendan C. Austin
How much does it cost to hire Brendan for a general case?
Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Brendan walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.
Does Brendan offer a free consultation?
Brendan charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Brendan's office. Some general attorneys offer free consults — check Brendan's current terms during booking.
How long do general cases in District of Columbia typically take?
Simple general matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Brendan gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.
Can Brendan take my case if I'm outside Washington?
Brendan is licensed in District of Columbia. Matters governed by District of Columbia law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Brendan will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.
What should I bring to my first meeting with Brendan?
Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Brendan will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.
Is Brendan accepting new general clients right now?
Brendan's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.
Areas served
General attorneys serving Washington and Belize City in District of Columbia
Brendan handles general matters throughout District of Columbia. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified general attorneys in that community.
More counsel
Other top-rated general attorneys in District of Columbia
If Brendan's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these general attorneys in Washington handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.

Bridget Michael Rohde
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 22

Joseph John Bottiglieri
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 20

Martin Jacobs
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 18

David Franklin Freeman, Jr.
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 16

Elizabeth Carrott Minnigh
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 15

Russell Randle
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 14