
Bruce Lee Simon, Consumer Attorney in San Francisco, California
Over 46 years of legal practice · focused on Consumer, General, and Litigation · 5.0/5 rating from 1 verified client review
PartneratPearson Warshaw, LLP
San Francisco, CA
Practicing consumer in San Francisco since 1980.
- 46+
- Years practicing
- 5.0 ★
- 1 client review
- 2
- Bar admissions
Practices in
Are you Bruce Lee Simon?
This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.
Quick answer
Bruce Lee Simon is a partner based in San Francisco, CA. The practice focuses on Consumer, General, and Litigation. Bruce has over 46 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Pearson Warshaw, LLP. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.
- Based in
- San Francisco, CA
- Experience
- over 46 years
- Known for
- Consumer · General · Litigation
- Handles Consumer, General, and Litigation matters from San Francisco, CA.
- Over 46 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
- Recognized with AV Preeminent.
About Bruce Lee Simon: Bruce Lee Simon is a partner based in San Francisco, CA. The practice focuses on Consumer, General, and Litigation. Bruce has over 46 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Pearson Warshaw, LLP. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.
Areas of practice
Practice areas handled by Bruce Lee Simon
Bruce concentrates on consumer, general, and litigation. Each area below outlines the kind of case Bruce handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.
Consumer
View other Consumer attorneys
General
View other General attorneys
Litigation
View other Litigation attorneys
Consumer cases in San Francisco, California
Bruce takes consumer matters in San Francisco, California. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Bruce agrees to represent you.
General cases in San Francisco, California
Bruce takes general matters in San Francisco, California. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Bruce agrees to represent you.
Litigation cases in San Francisco, California
Bruce takes litigation matters in San Francisco, California. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Bruce agrees to represent you.
Biography
About Bruce Lee Simon — Over 46 years of California consumer experience
Bruce Lee Simon is a partner based in San Francisco, CA. The practice focuses on Consumer, General, and Litigation. Bruce has over 46 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Pearson Warshaw, LLP. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.
Bruce L. Simon specializes in complex cases involving antitrust consumer fraud and securities cases. For the past 23 years he was a named partner at a nationally recognized firm, and served as lead counsel in many business cases with national and global significance. A fourth generation San Franciscan. He is a frequent speaker on trial strategies in business cases, and has lectured throughout the U.S. and internationally. Mr. Simon is the immediate past chair of the California State Bar Antitrust and Unfair Competition Section. He is also the past chair of the Business Torts Section of the American Trial Lawyers Association. Mr. Simon serves on the Board of Directors of the Hastings College of the Law. He is also an annual panelist for California Continuing Education of the Bar on Recent Developments in The Law. Mr. Simon is the co-author of the Matthew Bender Practice Guide: California Unfair Competition and Business Torts (2004), which provides in-depth and practical coverage of the State's Unfair Competition Law as well as antitrust law and other commonly prosecuted business torts. He has been active in community affairs. For example, he served as special counsel to the California State Senate Committee on Insurance in its investigation of the State's Insurance Commissioner. He has also been appointed counsel by the Federal Court as part of the court's pro bono prisoners' rights program. In addition, he served on the San Mateo County Civil Litigation Committee, which helped develop the first courthouse for high technology and complex litigation cases in San Mateo County. Mr. Simon is currently one of the principal attorneys in the In re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation, which is a multi-district litigation action pending in the Northern District of California. DRAM is one of several related high technology cases for which Mr. Simon serves as counsel, including cases related to SRAM, LCD, and Flash Memory. Settlements in DRAM top $300 million to date. Mr. Simon has extensive class action experience. He has served as lead or co-lead counsel in several nationwide class actions including In re Sodium Gluconate Antitrust Litigation (N.D. Cal.), an antitrust case involving a food additive product; In re Louisiana Pacific Corp. Inner-Seal OSB Trade Practices Litigation (ND Cal.), a product defect case involving a plywood substitute known as oriented strand board; County of Santa Clara v. Central Sprinkler (Santa Clara County Superior Court), another products liability action involving defective fire sprinklers; In re Methionine Antitrust Litigation, which resulted in over $100 million in settlements; and In re Behr Wood Sealant Litigation, which resulted in a $107 million settlement of claims alleging that certain sealants were defective. Mr. Simon also handled the In Re Citric Acid Antitrust Litigation which resulted in over $80 million in settlements for direct purchasers of this food additive product. Mr. Simon has also litigated and tried securities and investment fraud cases, and in particular, cases where the fraud was committed with the assistance of professionals. He tried the Osborne Securities case in Santa Clara County, and won a multi-million dollar jury verdict. That case involved critical issues about the responsibilities of accountants and eventually went to the Supreme Court, setting standards for accounting liability in California. He also represented Union Bank in a case against a national accounting firm that had provided misleading financial statements to the bank on behalf of a corporate borrower, and obtained a $7 million jury verdict that was upheld on appeal. Mr. Simon was the lead attorney in the HomeFed Securities Litigation in federal court in San Diego, where he pursued the derivative claims of the failed S&L. The HomeFed failure was one of the largest in United States history, and Mr. Simon was instrumental in obtaining in excess of $20 million in settlements just prior to trial. More recently, Mr. Simon has been involved as one of the lead attorneys in the Informix Securities Litigation, which involved the restatement of revenues in excess of $300 million, and he has been the principal attorney responsible for the Sybase and CBT derivative cases which involved cutting edge issues related to revenue recognition policies of such Silicon Valley companies. He was also involved in the In re Homestore Securities Litigation on behalf of the lead plaintiff, the California State Teachers' Retirement System. In an earlier settlement, Homestore.com, Inc. agreed to reform its corporate policies and to pay approximately $90 million in cash and stock to settle a class action lawsuit accusing the Internet real estate company of falsifying financial statements and engaging in accounting irregularities. More recently, PricewaterhouseCoopers, the accounting firm that audited Homestore.com's financial statements, agreed to pay $17.5 million to settle its part of the class action suit. Total assessments to date are over $100 million. He has been a contributor to the Communication and Entertainment Law Journal of the Hastings College of Law, 1979-1980; co-author of "Plaintiff's Perspective on Jury Strategies" and "Creative Use of Deposition Testimony at Trial," Accountants' Liability, 1990: Trial Strategies, Practicing Law Institute and California Continuing Education of the Bar; co-author of "Accountants' Liability: Calculation of Damages," Accountants' Liability 1991, Practicing Law Institute Practice; consultant for "Malicious Prosecution and Abuse of Process," Bancroft Whitney's California Civil Practice, Torts, Chap. 19; "Class Certification in Unfair Business Practices Cases," California Antitrust Law, Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the State Bar of California, 2002; "Cutting Edge Issues in Unfair Competition Law-What you Must Know," Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section, State Bar of California, May 2003; "Class Certification in Competition and Consumer Protection Cases," Treatise Chapter, Unfair Competition Law Section, State Bar of California, 2003. Mr. Simon has lectured on "Accountants' Liability," San Jose State University Business School, 1990-1992; "Current Issues in Accountant Liability," Santa Clara County Bar Business Litigation Section, 1990; "Coming to Grips With the Complex Commercial Case," California Trial Lawyer Association Annual Tahoe Seminar, 1992; Continuing Education of the Bar 13th Annual Development Program, February 1996; "The Use of Video Depositions," CSPA SF Chapter CPE Extravaganza, May 1996; "Products Liability," ALI-ABA Course, July 1996; Consumer Attorneys of California, "Legal Technology You Must Know to Practice Law in the 21st Century," 1996; San Mateo County Bar Association, "The Use of Technology in Depositions and Trial," 1997; Western Trial Lawyers Association, "Handling the Financial Fraud Case," 1998; "Indirect Purchaser Actions and Class Certification," ATLA Annual Seminar, 2001; "What Makes a Good Expert Witness," Business Valuation Roundtable, San Francisco, 2001. Mr. Simon has served as a panelist for the Litigation Section of the Bar Association of San Francisco and the San Francisco Chapter of the California Society of CPAs, "The Accounting Profession on Trial: Bily and Beyond," 1993; American Inns of Court, "The Leadership Challenge: Practical Applications for the Trial Lawyer," 1993; "Advanced Course on Products Liability Litigation, October 2000, Continuing Education of the Bar; "A Primer for Trial Lawyers - Antitrust Actions, A New Look," Montana Trial Lawyers Association, February 2000; "Antitrust and the New Economy," Association of Business Trial Lawyers September 2000; "B&P Code Section 17200 Claims and What They Mean To You, Consumer Attorneys of California 2002; "Fresh Perspectives on Class Action Litigation in the Wake of the Class Action Fairness Act and Proposition 64," California State Bar 13th Annual Golden State Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Institute, October 2005; "The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005: An Overview," American Bar Association Brown Bag Seminar, April 2005; "The International Cartel Workshop," American Bar Association International Forum 2004 and 2006.
Bruce's approach to consumer cases
Bruce L. Simon specializes in complex cases involving antitrust consumer fraud and securities cases. For the past 23 years he was a named partner at a nationally recognized firm, and served as lead counsel in many business cases with national and global significance. A fourth generation San Franciscan. He is a frequent speaker on trial strategies in business cases, and has lectured throughout the…
Clients Bruce works with
Bruce reviews new inquiries case-by-case for consumer, general, and litigation matters in San Francisco and the surrounding California area.
Credentials
Bruce Lee Simon's legal education and bar admissions
Hastings College of Law, University of California
J.D. Law · 1980
University of California at Berkeley
A.B. Political · 1977
Jurisdictions
Bruce's state bar admissions
U.S. Supreme Court
1985 · ACTIVE
California
1980 · ACTIVE
Bruce studied at J.D. Law in Hastings College of Law, University of California and A.B. Political in University of California at Berkeley.
Law school and academic background
Bruce completed J.D. Law in Hastings College of Law, University of California and A.B. Political in University of California at Berkeley. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Bruce runs in California is where that training gets applied to real client questions.
Recognition
Awards, publications, and recognition of Bruce Lee Simon
Bruce has received 1 formal recognition from bar associations, industry bodies, and peer-review services.
AV Preeminent
Legal awards and honors
AV Preeminent.
Affiliations
Bruce's professional memberships and bar associations
San Mateo County
Member, Bench, Bar, Media, Community Affairs Committees and Membership Committee San Mateo County Legal Technology Section) and American Bar Associations The State Bar of California (Member Antitrust and Unfair Competition Executive Committee of the State · membership
Edward J
membership
McFetridge American Inn of Court, Barrister National Association of Public Pension Attorneys
membership
Locations
Bruce Lee Simon's office in San Francisco
Bruce's primary office is at 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1205, San Francisco, CA, 941111. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.
Pearson Warshaw, LLP
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1205
San Francisco, CA 941111
Open in Google MapsClient feedback
Client reviews of Bruce Lee Simon — 5.0/5 rating from 1 verified client review
Every review below is from a verified client of Bruce. Reviews cover communication, case outcome, and value — the three signals that matter most when comparing consumer attorneys in San Francisco.
5.0
1 client review
Client ratings are sourced from public records and editorial research. Reviews on LawyersListed are accepted from verified clients once Bruce Lee Simon claims this profile.
Read all reviewsHiring guide
How to hire Bruce Lee Simon — what to expect in your first consultation
Working with a new consumer attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Bruce usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.
Consultation formats and pricing
Bruce charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Bruce's office.
What to bring to your first meeting
Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Bruce will tell you what matters and what doesn't.
Questions to ask a consumer attorney in San Francisco, California
A short list to run through before you commit: How many consumer matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?
Fees & payment
Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Bruce
Bruce discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in consumer practice — ask which fits.
Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options
Every consumer matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Bruce confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.
Payment methods and payment plans
Bruce's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many consumer practices work with clients on structured schedules.
Frequently asked
Frequently asked questions about Bruce Lee Simon
How much does it cost to hire Bruce for a consumer case?
Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Bruce walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.
Does Bruce offer a free consultation?
Bruce charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Bruce's office. Some consumer attorneys offer free consults — check Bruce's current terms during booking.
How long do consumer cases in California typically take?
Simple consumer matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Bruce gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.
Can Bruce take my case if I'm outside San Francisco?
Bruce is licensed in California. Matters governed by California law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Bruce will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.
What should I bring to my first meeting with Bruce?
Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Bruce will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.
Is Bruce accepting new consumer clients right now?
Bruce's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.
Areas served
Consumer attorneys serving San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego in California
Bruce handles consumer matters throughout California. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified consumer attorneys in that community.
- San Francisco26,380 attorneys
- Los Angeles39,975 attorneys
- San Diego16,903 attorneys
- Sacramento10,561 attorneys
- Irvine6,831 attorneys
- Oakland5,709 attorneys
- San Jose5,009 attorneys
- Palo Alto4,084 attorneys
- Beverly Hills3,348 attorneys
- Newport Beach3,106 attorneys
- Pasadena2,894 attorneys
- Santa Monica2,756 attorneys
More counsel
Other top-rated consumer attorneys in California
If Bruce's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these consumer attorneys in San Francisco handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.

Michael Shemtoub
Los Angeles, California
5.0· 218

Farid Yaghoubtil
Los Angeles, California
5.0· 155
Douglas MacMillan Borthwick
Santa Ana, California
5.0· 118

David Payab, Esq.
Woodland Hills, California
5.0· 108

Arsen Sarapinian, Esq.
Beverly Hills, California
5.0· 100

Jonathan P. Brian
Garden Grove, California
5.0· 74