Casey Alan Coyle

Casey Alan Coyle, Appellate Attorney in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

Over 17 years of legal practice · focused on Appellate and Litigation

Managing ShareholderatBabst Calland

Harrisburg, PA

Practicing appellate in Harrisburg since 2009.

17+
Years practicing
2
Bar admissions

Are you Casey Alan Coyle?

This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.

Claim this profile — free

Quick answer

Casey Alan Coyle is a managing shareholder based in Harrisburg, PA. The practice focuses on Appellate and Litigation. Casey has over 17 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Babst Calland.

Based in
Harrisburg, PA
Experience
over 17 years
Known for
Appellate · Litigation
  • Handles Appellate and Litigation matters from Harrisburg, PA.
  • Over 17 years of practice as a licensed attorney.

About Casey Alan Coyle: Casey Alan Coyle is a managing shareholder based in Harrisburg, PA. The practice focuses on Appellate and Litigation. Casey has over 17 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Babst Calland.

Areas of practice

Legal matters Casey takes on

Casey concentrates on appellate and litigation. Each area below outlines the kind of case Casey handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.

Appellate cases in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

Casey takes appellate matters in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Casey agrees to represent you.

Litigation cases in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

Casey takes litigation matters in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Casey agrees to represent you.

Biography

Meet Casey Alan Coyle — appellate lawyer in Harrisburg

Casey Alan Coyle is a managing shareholder based in Harrisburg, PA. The practice focuses on Appellate and Litigation. Casey has over 17 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Babst Calland.

Areas of Emphasis

Casey Alan Coyle is the Managing Shareholder of Babst Calland’s Harrisburg Office and past Co-Chair of the firm’s Appellate and Litigation Practice groups. He concentrates his practice on complex commercial litigation and appellate law.

Mr. Coyle has significant first-chair trial experience and regularly represents businesses in high-stakes or bet-the-company litigation in state and federal trial courts throughout the country. He has worked on a variety of cases, including cases involving breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duties, civil conspiracy, constitutional challenges, emergency injunctions, environmental litigation, non-competition/non-solicitation agreements, shareholder litigation, and theft of trade secrets. He also represents clients in matters brought before the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court as part of its original jurisdiction.

Beyond his extensive trial work, Mr. Coyle is a seasoned appellate lawyer. Over his career, he has represented either a party or an amicus curiae in over 15 appeals before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Mr. Coyle has successfully petitioned the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to grant review of an appeal—commonly known as “allocatur”—on six different occasions. In addition, he has presented oral argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, and Pennsylvania Superior Court. Mr. Coyle frequently serves as a commentator for The Legal Intelligencer and Law360 on appeals pending before the Pennsylvania appellate courts.

Representative Experience

• Representing a homebuilder in an appeal before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court involving Pennsylvania’s construction statute of repose. Aloia, et al. v. Diament Building Corp., No. 89 MAP 2024 (Pa.) (pending). As part of that representation, presented oral argument to the Supreme Court.

• Represented Harrisburg City Council in a lawsuit filed by Mayor Wanda R.D. Williams concerning Council’s decision to not fund four positions as part of the City’s 2026 budget. As part of the lawsuit, successfully defeated a preliminary and permanent injunction sought by the Mayor and successfully obtained dismissal of the lawsuit. Williams v. Harrisburg City Council, No. 2026-CV-00140 (Dauphin Cnty. Ct. Com. Pl.). Case featured in PennLive, TheBurg, Fox43, ABC27, and other media outlets.

• Represented a group of casinos at trial before the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court as part of its original jurisdiction and on an appeal before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in a case concerning the legality of the Pennsylvania Lottery’s iLottery program. Greenwood Gaming & Entertainment, Inc., et al. v. Department of Revenue, 306 A.3d 319 (Pa. 2023).

• Represented a Fortune 500 company in CERCLA and RCRA litigation in Wisconsin federal court in which the plaintiff sought nearly $30 million in past and future response costs and declaratory relief. After a two-week bench trial, the court awarded the plaintiff $0 in past response costs, reduced the plaintiff’s requested allocation of future response costs to the company by more than 40%, and dismissed the plaintiff’s RCRA claim. Barclay Lofts LLC, et al. v. PPG Industries, et al., 2:20-CV-01694 (D. Wis.).

• Represented Chester County in an appeal before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court concerning a challenge to the City of Chester’s attempt to acquire the assets of the Chester Water Authority. In re Chester Water Authority, ___ A.3d ___, 2026 WL 168066 (Pa. 2026). Successfully petitioned the Supreme Court to grant review of the appeal.

• Represented a publicly traded electric vehicle manufacturer against another publicly traded electric vehicle manufacturer in a tortious interference case in Arizona federal court involving more than $25 million in damages. Lion Electric Company v. Nikola Corporation, 2:23-CV-00372 (D. Ariz.).

• Represented a company in a lawsuit filed by the Pennsylvania Department of Health before the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court as part of its original jurisdiction involving DOH’s attempt to restrict attendance at the Carlisle Car Show pursuant to various orders issued by then-Governor Wolf and then-Secretary of Health Dr. Rachel Levine in connection with the COVID-19 epidemic. As part of that lawsuit, successfully defeated a preliminary injunction sought by DOH. Department of Health v. Carlisle Productions, Inc. d/b/a Carlisle Events, No. 350 MD 2020 (Pa. Commw. Ct.).

• Represented the Scranton Diocese as amicus curiae in an appeal before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court involving the statute of limitations for civil sexual abuse claims. Rice v. Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown, 255 A.3d 237 (Pa. 2021). As part of the appeal, provided substantial assistance to the appellants, including assisting them with successfully petitioning the Supreme Court to grant review of the appeal. Also quoted in the AP article, “Slew of church abuse lawsuits hinges on state court decision” (Aug. 14, 2020).

• Representing a franchisee against a nationwide franchisor in a breach of contract case pending in Pennsylvania federal court. As part of the representation, successfully defeated a preliminary injunction sought by the franchisor. Koala Insulation Franchisor, LLC v. Lotus & The Rooster Holdings Company, et al., No. 1:25-CV-01008 (M.D. Pa.) (pending).

• Representing a former C-suite executive in a civil conspiracy case before the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court as part of its original jurisdiction brought by the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner in his capacity as Statutory Rehabilitator of Senior Health Insurance Company of Pennsylvania (SHIP); the Commissioner is seeking over $500 million in damages. Humphreys v. Wegner, et al., No. 1 SHP 2020 (Pa. Commw. Ct.) (pending).

• Represented a nationwide flooring company in a non-competition/non-solicitation/theft of information case against a competitor and three former employees pending in Pennsylvania state court. Floormax Direct LLC t/b/d/a FloorMax USA v. Rahman, et al., No. 2025-CV-02469 (Dauphin Cnty. Ct. Com. Pl.). As part of the representation, successfully obtained a preliminary injunction against one of the individual defendants.

• Representing the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry, UPMC, Uber Technologies, Inc., and 15 other organizations as amicus curiae in an appeal before the Pennsylvania Superior Court concerning the scope of the Fair Share Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 7102. Holland v. WM Operating, LLC, et al., Nos. 4 EDA 2025 & 3380 EDA 2024 (Pa. Super. Ct.) (pending). Amicus brief featured in the article, “Pa. Biz Groups, Providers, Uber Want Fault Loophole Closed,” Law360 (Aug. 21, 2025).

• Representing an estate in a breach of contract case pending in Pennsylvania state court concerning an alleged right of first refusal. As part of the representation, successfully defeated a preliminary injunction sought by the management agent of the properties in question. JLD Property Management Group, Inc., et al. v. Estate of Harold D. Dumm, et al., No. 2024-CV-07085 (Dauphin Ctny. Ct. Com. Pl.) (pending).

• Represented the Pennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform, Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, and other trade associations and businesses as amicus curiae in an appeal before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court concerning the standard of proof required to establish forum non conveniens for a case involving an in-state plaintiff. Tranter v. Z & D Tour, Inc., 343 A.3d 1106 (Pa. 2025). Amicus brief quoted in article, “Industry Groups Back Appeal of Ruling They Claim ‘Would Effectively Abolish Venue’ in Pa.,” The Legal Intelligencer (June 17, 2024).

• Represented a trade association in Pennsylvania federal court in a case concerning a constitutional challenge to the City of Pittsburgh’s inclusionary zoning ordinance. Builders Association of Metropolitan Pittsburgh v. City of Pittsburgh, et al., No. 2:22-CV-00706 (W.D. Pa.) (pending). Complaint featured in the article, “Builders Sue To Stop Pittsburgh’s ‘Inclusionary Zoning’ Rule,” Law360 (May 12, 2022).

• Represented a school district in an appeal before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court involving media access to student records. Central Dauphin School District v. Hawkins, et al., 286 A.3d 726 (Pa. 2022). Successfully petitioned the Supreme Court to grant review of the appeal and presented oral argument to the Court.

• Represented the putative debtor in an involuntary bankruptcy before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. In re Deluxe Building Solutions, LLC, No. 5:21-BK-00534 (Bankr. M.D. Pa.). As part of the representation, participated in nine non-consecutive days of evidentiary hearings on the putative debtor’s motion to dismiss.

• Represented a publicly traded company in an appeal of a multi-million-dollar verdict before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The Bert Company v. Turk, et al., 298 A.3d 44 (Pa. 2023). Appeal involved, among other issues, the calculation of the constitutionally permissible ratio of compensatory-to-punitive damages in multidefendant cases. Successfully petitioned the Supreme Court to grant review of the appeal.

• Represented a leading provider of integrated specialty services to the global industrial, commercial, and infrastructure markets in Brand Energy & Infrastructure Servs., et al. v. Irex Corporation, et al., No. 5:16-CV-02499 (E.D. Pa.). Regarded as one of the leading cases nationally on the retroactive application of the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1836.

• Representing the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry, and other trade associations as amicus curiae in an appeal before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court concerning the constitutionality of the statutory damage caps established in Section 8528 of the Pennsylvania Sovereign Immunity Act. Freilich v. SEPTA, No. 10 EAP 2024 (Pa.) (pending). Amicus brief featured in the article, “Chamber Tells Pa. Justices To Keep Gov’t Suit Damages Cap,” Law360 (Aug. 5, 2024).

• Represented a 50-50 owner of a limited liability company in a shareholder dispute before the Centre County Court of Common Pleas and Tioga County Court of Common Pleas. Shaner, et al. v. Hendrick, et al., 2013-4525 (Centre Cnty. Ct. Com. Pl.); Hendrick, et al. v. Shaner, et al., No. 974-CV-2013 (Tioga Cnty. Ct. Com. Pl.). These companion cases involved the allegation that the other owner breached his fiduciary duties to the company, resulting in over $38 million in damages.

Background

Prior to joining Babst Calland, Mr. Coyle was a partner at a national law firm with offices throughout the eastern United States. While there, he served as Chair of the firm’s Appellate Practice Working Group. Before entering private practice, he served as a law clerk for the Honorable Thomas G. Saylor—Chief Justice Emeritus of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court—for nearly two and a half years.

Mr. Coyle graduated from Temple University Beasley School of Law, where he served as Editor-in-Chief of the Temple Journal of Science, Technology & Environmental Law. He earned his B.A. in Journalism, with distinction, from Pennsylvania State University. During his time at Penn State, Mr. Coyle was a member of the Phi Beta Kappa Honor Society and spent a semester in Washington, D.C., interning for CNN’s Capital Gang.

Memberships and Affiliations

Mr. Coyle is licensed to practice in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. He is also admitted before the United States Courts of Appeals for the Third and Sixth Circuits, and the United States District Courts for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, District of New Jersey, and Eastern District of Wisconsin.

Mr. Coyle is the Chair of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s Civil Procedural Rules Committee, which assists the Supreme Court in the preparation, revision, publication, and administration of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. He is also a Board Member for the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Historical Society, the Co-Chair of the Pennsylvania Defense Institute’s Amicus Curiae Committee, a member of the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Appellate Advocacy Committee, and a member of the James S. Bowman American Inn of Court. Mr. Coyle is a past President of the Middle District of Pennsylvania Chapter of the Federal Bar Association, currently serves as the Co-Chair of the Chapter’s CLE Committee, and served on the Planning Committee for the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania’s 2024 Bench/Bar Conference. He is a past member of the Third Circuit Lawyers Advisory Committee. In 2023, Mr. Coyle was invited to become a Fellow of the Foundation of the Federal Bar Association, an honor bestowed upon less than 300 lawyers nationwide who demonstrate commitment to and leadership within the FBA and the legal community.

Mr. Coyle was selected for inclusion in the 2026 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in the areas of Appellate Practice and Administrative/Regulatory Law. In 2024, he was selected by The Legal Intelligencer as one of only 13 “2024 Lawyers on the Fast Track, Small/Midsize Winners” statewide in Pennsylvania. This recognition is only given to attorneys under the age of 40 who have demonstrated excellence in four categories: development of the law; advocacy and community contributions; service to the bar; and peer and public recognition. He was selected to the Pennsylvania Rising Stars list for Business Litigation for ten consecutive years (2015—2024).

Working with Casey on a appellate matter

Areas of Emphasis Casey Alan Coyle is the Managing Shareholder of Babst Calland’s Harrisburg Office and past Co-Chair of the firm’s Appellate and Litigation Practice groups. He concentrates his practice on complex commercial litigation and appellate law. Mr. Coyle has significant first-chair trial experience and regularly represents businesses in high-stakes or bet-the-company litigation in state…

Who Casey represents

Casey reviews new inquiries case-by-case for appellate and litigation matters in Harrisburg and the surrounding Pennsylvania area.

Credentials

Education, bar admissions, and languages

  • Temple University Beasley School of Law

    J.D. · 2009

  • The Pennsylvania State University

    B.A. · 2006

Jurisdictions

Casey's state bar admissions

  • New Jersey

    2010 · ACTIVE

  • Pennsylvania United

    2009 · ACTIVE

Casey studied at J.D. in Temple University Beasley School of Law and B.A. in The Pennsylvania State University.

Law school and academic background

Casey completed J.D. in Temple University Beasley School of Law and B.A. in The Pennsylvania State University. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Casey runs in Pennsylvania is where that training gets applied to real client questions.

Affiliations

Casey's professional memberships and bar associations

  • Bowman American Inn of Court (Member) Federal Bar Association (Past President and Co-Chair, CLE Committee, Middle District of Pennsylvania Chapter) U

    membership

  • S

    membership

  • District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

    served on Planning Committee, 2024 Bench/Bar Conference) Third Circuit Lawyers Advisory Committee (past member) Federal Bar Association (Fellow of the Foundation · membership

Locations

Casey Alan Coyle's office in Harrisburg

Casey's primary office is at 300 N. 2nd Street, Suite 801, Harrisburg, PA, 17101. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.

Main office

Babst Calland

300 N. 2nd Street, Suite 801

Harrisburg, PA 17101

Open in Google Maps

Client feedback

Client reviews of Casey Alan Coyle

Casey has not yet collected verified client reviews on LawyersListed. Reviews here are all from confirmed clients; anonymous ratings are moderated out.

No reviews yet

Only verified clients who have consulted with Casey Alan Coyle can leave a review.

Schedule your consultation

Hiring guide

How to hire Casey Alan Coyle — what to expect in your first consultation

Working with a new appellate attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Casey usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.

Consultation formats and pricing

Casey charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Casey's office.

What to bring to your first meeting

Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Casey will tell you what matters and what doesn't.

Questions to ask a appellate attorney in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

A short list to run through before you commit: How many appellate matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?

Fees & payment

Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Casey

Casey discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in appellate practice — ask which fits.

Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options

Every appellate matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Casey confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.

Payment methods and payment plans

Casey's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many appellate practices work with clients on structured schedules.

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about Casey Alan Coyle

  • How much does it cost to hire Casey for a appellate case?

    Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Casey walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.

  • Does Casey offer a free consultation?

    Casey charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Casey's office. Some appellate attorneys offer free consults — check Casey's current terms during booking.

  • How long do appellate cases in Pennsylvania typically take?

    Simple appellate matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Casey gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.

  • Can Casey take my case if I'm outside Harrisburg?

    Casey is licensed in Pennsylvania. Matters governed by Pennsylvania law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Casey will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.

  • What should I bring to my first meeting with Casey?

    Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Casey will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.

  • Is Casey accepting new appellate clients right now?

    Casey's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.

Areas served

Appellate attorneys serving Harrisburg, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania

Casey handles appellate matters throughout Pennsylvania. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified appellate attorneys in that community.

More counsel

If Casey's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these appellate attorneys in Harrisburg handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.