DW

David Wolfe Rivkin, ADR Attorney in New York

Over 45 years of legal practice · focused on ADR, Class Action, and Contracts

PartneratDebevoise & Plimpton LLP

New, NY

Practicing adr in New York since 1981.

45+
Years practicing
1
Bar admission

Are you David Wolfe Rivkin?

This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.

Claim this profile — free

Quick answer

David Wolfe Rivkin is a partner based in New York, NY. The practice focuses on ADR, Class Action, and Contracts. David has over 45 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP.

Based in
New York, NY
Experience
over 45 years
Known for
ADR · Class Action · Contracts
  • Handles ADR, Class Action, and Contracts matters from New York, NY.
  • Over 45 years of practice as a licensed attorney.

About David Wolfe Rivkin: David Wolfe Rivkin is a partner based in New York, NY. The practice focuses on ADR, Class Action, and Contracts. David has over 45 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP.

Areas of practice

Legal matters David takes on

David concentrates on adr, class action, contracts, general, and litigation. Each area below outlines the kind of case David handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.

ADR cases in New York

David takes adr matters in New York. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before David agrees to represent you.

Class Action cases in New York

David takes class action matters in New York. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before David agrees to represent you.

Contracts cases in New York

David takes contracts matters in New York. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before David agrees to represent you.

General cases in New York

David takes general matters in New York. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before David agrees to represent you.

Litigation cases in New York

David takes litigation matters in New York. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before David agrees to represent you.

Biography

Meet David Wolfe Rivkin — adr lawyer in New York

David Wolfe Rivkin is a partner based in New York, NY. The practice focuses on ADR, Class Action, and Contracts. David has over 45 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP.

David Wolfe Rivkin is a lawyer practicing arbitration, contracts & agreements, litigation and 3 other areas of law. David received a B.A. degree from Yale University in 1977, and has been licensed for 45 years. David practices at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP in New York, NY and 1 other location.

David's approach to adr cases

David Wolfe Rivkin is a lawyer practicing arbitration, contracts & agreements, litigation and 3 other areas of law. David received a B.A. degree from Yale University in 1977, and has been licensed for 45 years. David practices at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP in New York, NY and 1 other location.

Clients David works with

David reviews new inquiries case-by-case for adr, class action, and contracts matters across New York.

Credentials

Education, bar admissions, and languages

  • Yale Law School

    J.D. · 1980

  • Yale University

    B.A. · 1977

Jurisdictions

David's state bar admissions

  • New York

    1981 · ACTIVE

David studied at J.D. in Yale Law School and B.A. in Yale University.

Law school and academic background

David completed J.D. in Yale Law School and B.A. in Yale University. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice David runs in New York is where that training gets applied to real client questions.

Affiliations

David's professional memberships and bar associations

  • of the London-based Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

    bar_fellowship

  • a Fellow of the College of Commercial Arbitrators

    bar_fellowship

  • a member of the Commission on Settlement in International Arbitration of the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR)

    bar_fellowship

  • a member of the Centro Internacional de Arbitraje, Mediacion y Negociacion of the Instituto Universitario de Estudios Europeas, Universidad de San Pablo in Madrid

    bar_fellowship

  • and a member of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York . Mr. Rivkin is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He was appointed by the U.S. State and Commerce Departments to be a founding member of the NAFTA Advisory Committee on Private

    bar_fellowship

  • "United States," Arbitration World (European Lawyer 2006), co-author

    bar_fellowship

  • "International Commercial Arbitration: A Primer for U.S. Litigators," International Litigation (ABA 2005)

    bar_fellowship

  • "The Impact of Parallel and Successive Proceedings on the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards," Parallel State and Arbitral Procedures in International Arbitration (ICC 2005)

    bar_fellowship

  • "A Growing Challenge for Ethics in International Arbitration," Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner (ICC 2005)

    bar_fellowship

  • "Drafting and Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in the United States and England," Transatlantic Commercial Litigation and Arbitration (Oceana 2004), co-author

    bar_fellowship

  • "Forum Non Conveniens: a Doctrine on the Move" in Business Law International (January 2004)

    bar_fellowship

  • "21st Century Arbitration Worthy of Its Name," in Law of International Business and Dispute Settlement in the 21st Century (2001)

    bar_fellowship

  • "International Disputes" in Alternative Dispute Resolution, The Litigators Handbook (ABA 2000)

    bar_fellowship

  • "ADR and Mass Claims Resolutions," in The Claims Resolution Process on Dormant Accounts in Switzerland (ASA Swiss Arbitration Assoc. 2000)

    bar_fellowship

  • "1997: A Year of Rules Changes" in International Arbitration Law Review in February 1998

    bar_fellowship

  • "Attempts to Use Section 1782 to Obtain US Discovery in Aid of Foreign Arbitrations," in Arbitration International (v. 14, no. 2, 1998)

    bar_fellowship

  • "International Commercial Arbitration in the United States," published in both International Commercial Arbitration and Asia Law in 1997

    bar_fellowship

  • "The Expansion of International Arbitration" in ADR & the Law in 1997

    bar_fellowship

  • "The Boom in Arbitration in Asia" in Asia Law and "Avoiding the Uncertainty of Foreign Courts" in Corporate Counsel Magazine , both in 1996

    bar_fellowship

  • various articles on sovereign immunity, cross-border litigation, enforcement of foreign judgments and on discovery abroad, which appeared in 1994 and 1995

    bar_fellowship

  • "Lex Mercatoria and Force Majeure" in Transnational Rules and International Commercial Arbitration (1993)

    bar_fellowship

  • "The U.S. Situation" in Competition and Arbitration Law (1993)

    bar_fellowship

  • "Enforceability of Arbitral Awards Based on Lex Mercatoria," 9 Arbitration International 1 (1993)

    bar_fellowship

  • "In Support of the F.A.A.: An Argument Against Adoption of the UNCITRAL Model Law," 1 American Review of International Arbitration 535 (1990) (published February 1992)

    bar_fellowship

  • the chapter on "International Arbitration" in Commercial Arbitration in the 1990s (1991) and "Restrictions on Foreign Counsel in International Arbitrations," XVI Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 402 (1991). Mr. Rivkin has also written and spoken on SEC enf

    bar_fellowship

  • Recent Trends in Investment Treaty Arbitration, April 16, 2008

    bar_fellowship

  • Improving the Efficiency of International Arbitration, April 08, 2008

    bar_fellowship

  • Energy and Natural Resources Disputes in the Americas, February 29, 2008

    bar_fellowship

  • President's Welcome, February 02, 2008

    bar_fellowship

  • Committee Co-Chair Welcome, February 01, 2008

    bar_fellowship

  • Institutional advantages and disadvantages, December 07, 2007

    bar_fellowship

  • Investment Treaty Arbitration: Making Arbitration More Efficient, October 25, 2007

    bar_fellowship

  • IBA Task Force on Extraterritorial Jurisdiction - North American Forum - Arbitration in the energy and natural resources industries, October 14, 2007

    bar_fellowship

  • IBA Task Force on Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: North American Forum, October 14, 2007

    bar_fellowship

  • A New Paradigm in International Arbitration, July 20, 2007

    bar_fellowship

  • Keynote Address: The Challenge of Youth: The IBA and the future of the legal profession, May 25, 2007

    bar_fellowship

  • Opening Remarks on Behalf of IBA, May 24, 2007

    bar_fellowship

  • Increasing Private Litigation in Europe, May 01, 2007

    bar_fellowship

  • Discussion Leader: Written Statements - Documentary Evidence - Information Technology in Arbitration Proceedings

    bar_fellowship

  • Discussion Leader: The Hearing(s) - Witnesses, January 19, 2007

    bar_fellowship

  • The Changing Dynamics of International Arbitration, November 29, 2006

    bar_fellowship

  • The Role of State Courts: Intervention or Support, July 12, 2006

    bar_fellowship

  • Techniques for Eliciting Expert Testimony, June 02, 2006

    bar_fellowship

  • I'm Not a Lawyer, But I Play One on TV, April 20, 2006

    bar_fellowship

  • Investment Treaty Arbitration, April 18, 2006

    bar_fellowship

  • Commercial Arbitration for Asian Countries, April 17, 2006. PUBLICATIONS: Current Trends in US and International Arbitration 2008, — Arbitration Review of the Americas, a Global Arbitration Review Special Report

    bar_fellowship

  • Procedural Issues to Consider, September 21, 2007 — Practitioner's Handbook on International Arbitration and Mediation

    bar_fellowship

  • Bolivia Withdraws From The ICSID Convention, June 06, 2007

    bar_fellowship

  • U.S. Courts Increasingly Impose Class Action Arbitration In Cases Involving A Large Number Of Claimants, December 15, 2006

    bar_fellowship

  • Trends in US and International Arbitration, 2007 — Arbitration Review of the Americas 2007

    bar_fellowship

  • Enforcing Badly Drafted Arbitration Clauses: U.S. Court Of Appeals For The First Circuit's Decision In Marks 3- Zet-Ernst Marks Gmbh & Co. Kg V. Presstek, Inc. Sends A Warning To Both Drafters And Litigants, August 22, 2006

    bar_fellowship

  • A Growing Challenge for Ethics in International Arbitration, ICC 2005 — Liber Amercorum Robert Briner

    bar_fellowship

  • The Impact of Parallel and Successive Proceedings on the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, ICC 2005 — Parallel State and Arbitral Procedures in International Arbitration

    bar_fellowship

  • International Commercial Arbitration: A Primer for U.S. Litigators, ABA 2005 — International Litigation

    bar_fellowship

  • Drafting and Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in the United States and England, November 15, 2004 — Transatlantic Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

    bar_fellowship

  • Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain: The Supreme Court's First Comprehensive Look at the Alien Tort Statute, June 30, 2004

    bar_fellowship

  • Forum Non Conveniens a Doctrine on the Move, January 15, 2004 — Business Law International

    bar_fellowship

  • United States, European Lawyer 2004 — Arbitration World

    bar_fellowship

  • Forum Non Conveniens: a Doctrine on the Move, January 2004 — Business Law International

    bar_fellowship

  • Drafting and Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in the United States and England, Oceana 2004 — Transatlantic Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

    bar_fellowship

  • Drafting and Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in the United States and England, 2004 — Transatlantic Commercial Litigation and Arbitration

    bar_fellowship

  • Model Law Decisions: Cases aplying the UNCITRAL Model Law on Arbitration, 1985-2001, 2003

    bar_fellowship

  • 21st Century Arbitration Worthy of its Name, 2001 — Law of International Business and Dispute Settlement in the 21st Century

    bar_fellowship

  • International Disputes, ABA 2000 — Alternative Dispute Resolution, The Litigators Handbook

    bar_fellowship

  • ADR and Mass Claims Resolutions, ASA Swiss Arbitration Assoc. 2000 — The Claims Resolution Process on Dormant Accounts in Switzerland

    bar_fellowship

  • Future Developments in U.S. Arbitration, July 01, 1998 — Guide to the World's Leading Experts in Commercial Arbitration

    bar_fellowship

  • Attempts to Use Section 1782 to Obtain US Discovery in Aid of Foreign Arbitrations, June 01, 1998 — Arbitration International - The Journal of the London Court of International Arbitration

    bar_fellowship

  • 1997: A Year of Rules Changes, February 1998 — International Arbitration Law Review

    bar_fellowship

  • Attempts to Use Section 1782 to Obtain US Discovery in Aid of Foreign Arbitrations, v. 14, no. 2, 1998 — Arbitration International

    bar_fellowship

  • Litigation and Arbitration in Central and Eastern Europe, 1998

    bar_fellowship

  • Litigation and Arbitration in Central and Eastern Europe, January 01, 1998

    bar_fellowship

  • International Commercial Arbitration in the United States, 1997 — International Commercial Arbitration and Asia Law

    bar_fellowship

  • Avoiding the Uncertainty of Foreign Courts, 1996 — Corporate Counsel Magazine

    bar_fellowship

  • The U.S. Situation, 1993 — Competition and Arbitration Law

    bar_fellowship

  • Enforceability of Arbitral Awards Based on Lex Mercatoria, 1993 — 9 Arbitration International 1

    bar_fellowship

  • Lex Mercatoria and Force Majeure, 1993 — Transnational Rules and International Commercial Arbitration

    bar_fellowship

  • In Support of the F.A.A.: An Argument Against Adoption of the UNCITRAL Model Law, February 1992 — 1 American Review of International Arbitration 535

    bar_fellowship

  • The Regulations Governing Broking, December 1991 — International Financial Law Review

    bar_fellowship

  • Restrictions on Foreign Counsel in International Arbitrations, 1991 — XVI Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 402

    bar_fellowship

  • International Arbitration, 1991 — Commercial Arbitration in the 1990s

    bar_fellowship

  • Stockbroker Supervision: Managing Stockbrokers and Surviving Sanctions, 1990

    bar_fellowship

Locations

David Wolfe Rivkin's office in New York

David's primary office is at 919 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.

Main office

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

919 Third Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Open in Google Maps

Client feedback

Client reviews of David Wolfe Rivkin

David has not yet collected verified client reviews on LawyersListed. Reviews here are all from confirmed clients; anonymous ratings are moderated out.

No reviews yet

Only verified clients who have consulted with David Wolfe Rivkin can leave a review.

Schedule your consultation

Hiring guide

How to hire David Wolfe Rivkin — what to expect in your first consultation

Working with a new adr attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with David usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.

Consultation formats and pricing

David charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain David's office.

What to bring to your first meeting

Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; David will tell you what matters and what doesn't.

Questions to ask a adr attorney in New York

A short list to run through before you commit: How many adr matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?

Fees & payment

Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for David

David discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in adr practice — ask which fits.

Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options

Every adr matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. David confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.

Payment methods and payment plans

David's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many adr practices work with clients on structured schedules.

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about David Wolfe Rivkin

  • How much does it cost to hire David for a adr case?

    Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. David walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.

  • Does David offer a free consultation?

    David charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain David's office. Some adr attorneys offer free consults — check David's current terms during booking.

  • How long do adr cases in New York typically take?

    Simple adr matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. David gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.

  • Can David take my case if I'm outside New York?

    David is licensed in New York. Matters governed by New York law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — David will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.

  • What should I bring to my first meeting with David?

    Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. David will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.

  • Is David accepting new adr clients right now?

    David's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.

Areas served

ADR attorneys serving Albany and Brooklyn in New York

David handles adr matters throughout New York. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified adr attorneys in that community.

More counsel

If David's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these adr attorneys in New York handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.