Jack Russo

Jack Russo, ADR Attorney in Palo Alto, California

Over 46 years of legal practice · focused on ADR, Business, and Contracts · 5.0/5 rating from 1 verified client review

Managing PartneratComputerLaw Group LLP

Palo Alto, CA

Practicing adr in Palo Alto since 1980.

46+
Years practicing
5.0 ★
1 client review
7
Bar admissions

Are you Jack Russo?

This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.

Claim this profile — free

Quick answer

Jack Russo is a managing partner based in Palo Alto, CA. The practice focuses on ADR, Business, and Contracts. Jack has over 46 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at ComputerLaw Group LLP. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.

Based in
Palo Alto, CA
Experience
over 46 years
Known for
ADR · Business · Contracts
  • Handles ADR, Business, and Contracts matters from Palo Alto, CA.
  • Over 46 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
  • Recognized with AV Preeminent.

About Jack Russo: Jack Russo is a managing partner based in Palo Alto, CA. The practice focuses on ADR, Business, and Contracts. Jack has over 46 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at ComputerLaw Group LLP. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.

Areas of practice

Legal matters Jack takes on

Jack concentrates on adr, business, contracts, general, and internet. Each area below outlines the kind of case Jack handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.

ADR cases in Palo Alto, California

Jack takes adr matters in Palo Alto, California. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Jack agrees to represent you.

Business cases in Palo Alto, California

Jack takes business matters in Palo Alto, California. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Jack agrees to represent you.

Contracts cases in Palo Alto, California

Jack takes contracts matters in Palo Alto, California. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Jack agrees to represent you.

General cases in Palo Alto, California

Jack takes general matters in Palo Alto, California. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Jack agrees to represent you.

Internet cases in Palo Alto, California

Jack takes internet matters in Palo Alto, California. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Jack agrees to represent you.

Biography

Meet Jack Russo — adr lawyer in Palo Alto

Jack Russo is a managing partner based in Palo Alto, CA. The practice focuses on ADR, Business, and Contracts. Jack has over 46 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at ComputerLaw Group LLP. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.

Mr. Russo is a frequent speaker on computer law issues and has given presentations to the American Bar Association, the Practicing Law Institute, the Computer Law Association, and the San Francisco Bay Area Intellectual Property American Inn of Court.

Mr. Russo serves as an arbitrator, mediator, and early neutral evaluator for the U.S. District Court (N.D. California), the Santa Clara County Superior Court, and the American Arbitration Association, as well as a Judge Pro Tempore of the Santa Clara County Superior Court.

Mr. Russo specializes in Internet, computer law, and intellectual property litigation. In addition, Mr. Russo is in charge of the Firm's entrepreneurship practice.

Mr. Russo has been recognized by the National Institute for Trial Advocacy for his training as a master advocate.

Order of the Coif. Member, American Inns of Court (San Francisco Intellectual Property). Member: UCLA Law Review, 1979-1980; UCLA Moot Court. Co-Author: "Protection of Computer Software After the Copyright Act in Protection of Computer Software & Databases," Law & Business, 1981; "Pre-Trial and Discovery in a Software Marketing Agreement Dispute in Computer Litigation," Law and Business, 1983; "Copyright Law with an Emphasis on Computer Software Disputes in Computer Litigation," Practicing Law Institute, 1983; "Copyright Law and Computer Software Disputes," Practicing Law Institute, 1983; "Do the 'Box-Top' Computer Software License Agreement Work?" Software Protection, Law & Technology, 1984; "Microcomputer Software Marketing Agreement Disputes," Practicing Law Institute, 1985; "Copyright in the 'Look and Feel' of Computer Software," The Computer Lawyer, February, 1985; "The Impact of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act on California Trade Secret Law," Trade Secret Law Reporter, May, 1985; "Recent U.S. Developments in Copyright Protection," 1 International Computer Law Adviser 5-7 (No. 4 January 1987); "Software Copyright Protection," 5 Software Publisher's Association News 3-4 (No. 1 January 1988); "Developments in Copyright Protection of Computer Software," 2 International Computer Law Adviser 9-12 (No. 4 January 1988); "Recent Developments in the Copyright Protection of the 'Look and Feel' of Computer Software: Apple Computer v. Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard," 6 Software Protection 1-15 (No. 10 March 1988); "Copyright Protection for Computer Software in the 1990s," USC Computer Law Institute, May 1989; "Copyright Protection of Virtual Reality," ABA Science and Technology 1992; "New Frontiers: Copyright Protection in Virtual Reality Works," 15 The National Law Journal S1 (No. 6 October 12, 1992); "Software 'Look and Feel' Protection in the 1990's," 15 Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 571-603 (1993); "Virtual Reality-A Legal Overview" Chapter 19 in Computer Software, Clark Boardman, 1994; "Liability on the Internet," San Francisco Intellectual Property Association (March, 1995); "Trade Dress Protection in the 'Look and Feel' of Computer Software and World Wide Web Sites," 2 Cyberspace Lawyer, (No. 8, Nov. 1997); "Checklist for Trademark Litigation," Basic Trademark Law (PLI 1998); "The Trade Secret 'Inevitable Disclosure' Doctrine," Reports for the ABA Section of Intellectual Property Subcommittee on Computer Software and Trade Secret Law, 1997-1999. Public Presentations: Competitive Intellectual Property Litigation: Special Problems for Mediators, Evaluators and Other Neutrals U.S. District Court Program, March 1999; Presenting Expert Witnesses in Patent Cases and at Markman Hearings: The Use of Daubert and Related Objections Inn of Court Program, March 1999; Trade Expression in the "Look and Feel" of World Wide Web Site Graphical User Interface, International Trademark Association, 1997; Lanham Act Protection for World Wide Web Site, State Bar of California, Digital Trademark Conference, 1997; "Look and Feel" Protection in the 1990s, Hastings School of Law, COMM/ENT Law Conference, 1993; Scope of Copyright Protection for Virtual Worlds and Virtual Objects, ABA, Section on International Law, 1993; Copyright Protection for Virtual Realities, American Bar Association, Section on Science & Technology, August 1992; Problems in Computer-Based Licensor-Licensee Relationships, USC Computer Law Institute, May 1990; Strict Liability in Computer Software Cases, Minnesota State Bar Computer Law Association, April 1990; Copyright Protection of Computer Software in the 1990s, MacWeek ID89 Interface Design Conference, September 1989; Testimony before the United States Copyright Office Regarding Copyright Protection of Computer Software Textual Screen Displays, September 9, 1987; Developments in Trade Secret Law, Minnesota Bar, April 1987; California Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Santa Clara, June 1986; Licensor/Licensee Software Litigation, PLI, March 1985; Copyright Registration of Trade Secret Works, Minnesota, October 1984; Trade Secret Protection of Corporate Information Assets, National Computer Conference, May 1983; Copyright Protection of Computer Software, PLI, January 1983. Adjunct Professor, University of Santa Clara. Judge Pro Tem, Santa Clara Superior Court. Arbitrator, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; Arbitrator, American Arbitration Association. Chairman, Foundation for Creativity in Dispute Resolution. Formerly with: Russo & Hale LLP; Fenwick & West.

Working with Jack on a adr matter

Mr. Russo is a frequent speaker on computer law issues and has given presentations to the American Bar Association, the Practicing Law Institute, the Computer Law Association, and the San Francisco Bay Area Intellectual Property American Inn of Court. Mr. Russo serves as an arbitrator, mediator, and early neutral evaluator for the U.S. District Court (N.D. California), the Santa Clara County…

Who Jack represents

Jack reviews new inquiries case-by-case for adr, business, and contracts matters in Palo Alto and the surrounding California area.

Credentials

Education, bar admissions, and languages

  • University of California at Los Angeles School of Law

    J.D. · 1980

  • Brooklyn College of the City University of New York B.A. Urban Management and Computer and Information Science, magna cum laude Brooklyn College of the City University of New York M.A. Univer

Jurisdictions

Jack's state bar admissions

  • Florida

    2021 · ACTIVE

  • Oregon

    1999 · ACTIVE

  • Washington

    1999 · ACTIVE

  • Hawaii

    1994 · ACTIVE

  • District of Columbia

    1993 · ACTIVE

  • New York

    1981 · ACTIVE

  • California

    1980 · ACTIVE

Jack studied at J.D. in University of California at Los Angeles School of Law and — in Brooklyn College of the City University of New York B.A. Urban Management and Computer and Information Science, magna cum laude Brooklyn College of the City University of New York M.A. Univer.

Law school and academic background

Jack completed J.D. in University of California at Los Angeles School of Law and — in Brooklyn College of the City University of New York B.A. Urban Management and Computer and Information Science, magna cum laude Brooklyn College of the City University of New York M.A. Univer. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Jack runs in California is where that training gets applied to real client questions.

Recognition

Recognition and thought leadership

Jack has received 1 formal recognition from bar associations, industry bodies, and peer-review services.

  • AV Preeminent

Legal awards and honors

AV Preeminent.

Affiliations

Jack's professional memberships and bar associations

  • S

    membership

  • A

    membership

  • International Trademark Association National Institute of Trial Advocacy

    membership

Locations

Jack Russo's office in Palo Alto

Jack's primary office is at 401 Florence Street, Palo Alto, CA, 94301-1706. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.

Main office

ComputerLaw Group LLP

401 Florence Street

Palo Alto, CA 94301-1706

Open in Google Maps

Client feedback

Client reviews of Jack Russo — 5.0/5 rating from 1 verified client review

Every review below is from a verified client of Jack. Reviews cover communication, case outcome, and value — the three signals that matter most when comparing adr attorneys in Palo Alto.

5.0

1 client review

Client ratings are sourced from public records and editorial research. Reviews on LawyersListed are accepted from verified clients once Jack Russo claims this profile.

Read all reviews

Hiring guide

How to hire Jack Russo — what to expect in your first consultation

Working with a new adr attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Jack usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.

Consultation formats and pricing

Jack charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Jack's office.

What to bring to your first meeting

Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Jack will tell you what matters and what doesn't.

Questions to ask a adr attorney in Palo Alto, California

A short list to run through before you commit: How many adr matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?

Fees & payment

Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Jack

Jack discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in adr practice — ask which fits.

Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options

Every adr matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Jack confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.

Payment methods and payment plans

Jack's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many adr practices work with clients on structured schedules.

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about Jack Russo

  • How much does it cost to hire Jack for a adr case?

    Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Jack walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.

  • Does Jack offer a free consultation?

    Jack charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Jack's office. Some adr attorneys offer free consults — check Jack's current terms during booking.

  • How long do adr cases in California typically take?

    Simple adr matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Jack gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.

  • Can Jack take my case if I'm outside Palo Alto?

    Jack is licensed in California. Matters governed by California law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Jack will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.

  • What should I bring to my first meeting with Jack?

    Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Jack will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.

  • Is Jack accepting new adr clients right now?

    Jack's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.

Areas served

ADR attorneys serving Palo Alto, Los Angeles and San Francisco in California

Jack handles adr matters throughout California. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified adr attorneys in that community.

More counsel

If Jack's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these adr attorneys in Palo Alto handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.