
John J. Hare, Appellate Attorney in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Over 32 years of legal practice · focused on Appellate and General · 5.0/5 rating from 19 verified client reviews
Shareholder, Chair, Appellate Advocacy and Post-Trial PracticeatMarshall Dennehey
Philadelphia, PA
Practicing appellate in Philadelphia since 1994.
- 32+
- Years practicing
- 5.0 ★
- 19 client reviews
Are you John J. Hare?
This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.
Quick answer
John J. Hare is a shareholder, chair, appellate advocacy and post-trial practice based in Philadelphia, PA. The practice focuses on Appellate and General. John has over 32 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Marshall Dennehey. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 19 client reviews.
- Based in
- Philadelphia, PA
- Experience
- over 32 years
- Known for
- Appellate · General
- Handles Appellate and General matters from Philadelphia, PA.
- Over 32 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
- Recognized with AV Preeminent.
About John J. Hare: John J. Hare is a shareholder, chair, appellate advocacy and post-trial practice based in Philadelphia, PA. The practice focuses on Appellate and General. John has over 32 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Marshall Dennehey. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 19 client reviews.
Areas of practice
Legal matters John takes on
John concentrates on appellate and general. Each area below outlines the kind of case John handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.
Appellate cases in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
John takes appellate matters in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before John agrees to represent you.
General cases in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
John takes general matters in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before John agrees to represent you.
Biography
Meet John J. Hare — appellate lawyer in Philadelphia
John J. Hare is a shareholder, chair, appellate advocacy and post-trial practice based in Philadelphia, PA. The practice focuses on Appellate and General. John has over 32 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Marshall Dennehey. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 19 client reviews.
John is a member of Marshall Dennehey's three-person Executive Committee, which is responsible for the firm’s daily operations and management of more than 500 attorneys across 19 offices in seven states. He also serves on the firm’s Board of Directors and as chair of the fifteen-attorney Appellate Advocacy & Post-Trial Practice.
As appellate counsel, John has litigated more than 500 appeals in state and federal appellate courts, representing individuals, corporations, and insurers in many of Pennsylvania’s highest-profile civil appeals. As amicus curiae counsel, John has represented a diverse clientele, including the United States Chamber of Commerce, the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry, the American Medical Association, the Pennsylvania Medical Society, the Pennsylvania Defense Institute, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, other Pennsylvania lawyers, and academics interested in the outcome of appellate litigation.
John is actively involved in the Pennsylvania legal community. He has edited and co-authored two books on Pennsylvania appellate courts. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania; Life and Law in the Commonwealth, 1684-2017, was published by the Pennsylvania State University Press in 2018. Keystone of Justice: The Pennsylvania Superior Court, 1895-1995, was published by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 2000.
John serves by appointment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania as the co-chair of the Court’s Historical Commission and on the Commission on Judicial Independence, a group of state and federal judges, academics, and attorneys who promote public awareness of the importance of a strong and independent judiciary. He also spent six years on the Supreme Court’s Civil Procedural Rules Committee, the last two years as chair, and served on the Board of Governors of the Bar Association of the Third Federal Circuit and as co-chair of the Amicus Curiae Committee of the Pennsylvania Defense Institute. He also serves on the advisory board of Ohlbaum on the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence (Lexis-Nexis) and regularly speaks at appellate court events and continuing legal education seminars.
Pennsylvania Super Lawyers magazine has repeatedly recognized John as a Top 100 lawyer in both Philadelphia and Pennsylvania based on a peer selection and evaluation process. He has also been selected as a Super Lawyer in the area of appellate practice every year since 2008. He has been repeatedly selected to The Best Lawyers in America and is a fellow of the American Academy of Appellate Lawyers, a member of the International Association of Defense Counsel, and has an AV Preeminent (5.0/5.0) rating by Martindale-Hubbell, the highest rating for professional competence.
John is regularly called upon by the media to provide insight and commentary on significant legal issues. To view recent articles in which John is quoted, click the Media Commentary section below.
Honors & Awards
•Legal 500 Philadelphia Legal Elite, Commercial Disputes (2025-2026)
•Chambers USA, Pennsylvania: Litigation: Appellate Law, Band One (2025)
•AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell
•The Best Lawyers in America, Appellate Practice (2024-2026)
•Pennsylvania Super Lawyers (2008-2026; Top 100 in Pennsylvania, 2018-2026; Top 100 in Philadelphia, 2018-2026)
•Philadelphia Business Journal, Best of the Bar Award, 2023 and 2018
•The Philadelphia Inquirer, Influencers of Law Award, 2019
Classes/Seminars Taught
•Combatting Nuclear Verdicts in Plaintiff-Friendly Jurisdictions, A.M. Best Insurance Law Podcast, October 30, 2025
•New Voir Dire Rule Pa.R.C.P. 220.3, Philadelphia Bar Association Live Webcast CLE, March 19, 2025
•Speak Easy and Write Stuff: Effective Communication Techniques for Appellate Courts, CLE presented to Superior Court of Pennsylvania judges, law clerks, and legal staff, September 22, 2023
•The Chief Justices of Pennsylvania, CLE presented to Supreme Court of Pennsylvania at The Lawyers Club of Philadelphia, September 14, 2023
•The Transformation of Pennsylvania Law, CLE presented for Pennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform, September 11, 2023
•Annual Civil Litigation Update 2023, Pennsylvania Bar Institute, August 31, 2023
•Litigation Update Seminar, Pennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform, May 29, 2023
•The Development of Our Supreme Court, Tricentennial Anniversary of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, National Constitution Center, May 21-22, 2022, Moderator and Speaker
•Civil Litigation Update 2022, Pennsylvania Bar Institute, March 4, 2022
•Civil Litigation Update 2021, Pennsylvania Bar Institute, March 4, 2021
•Judicial Engagement and the Pennsylvania Constitution, Institute for Justice, Center for Judicial Engagement, October 16, 2020
•The “New” Pennsylvania Supreme Court; Reflections on the Last Three-Plus Years, Pennsylvania Bar Institute, September 9, 2019
•Your Case is in the News; Handling High-Profile Litigation, Moderator, American Academy of Appellate Lawyers, 2019 Spring Conference, April 13, 2019
•The Pennsylvania Constitution: An Independent Source of Rights and Judicial Power, Pennsylvania State Trial Judges Conference, February 21, 2019
•The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: Life and Law in the Commonwealth, 1684-2017: A Conversation, hosted by Duquesne University for Pennsylvania Supreme Court, October 24, 2018
Published Works
•'What Lawyers Can do to Protect and Promote Judicial Independence,” Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly, January 2026
•'Chief Justice Baer and the Supreme Court’s Tricentennial Anniversary,' 62 Duquesne Law Review 1, Winter 2024
•'Medical Malpractice Venue Un-Reform,' Claims Judicial and Legislative Affairs Quarterly Update (CJLA), Spring 2023
•The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania; Life and Law in the Commonwealth, 1684-2017 (Hare ed., Penn State, 2018)
•'What’s New In 2017? Filing Trends and Developments In Asbestos Litigation,' Mealey's Litigation Reports, August 16, 2017
•'Sunlight is the Best Disinfectant; Solutions to the Concealment of Asbestos Trust Filings in Tort Litigation,' For The Defense, April 2016
•'Uncloaking Bankruptcy Trust Filings In Asbestos Litigation: Refuting the Myths About Transparency,' Mealey's Asbestos Bankruptcy Report and Mealey's Litigation Report Asbestos, April 2016
•'Uncloaking Bankruptcy Trust Filings In Asbestos Litigation: A Survey Of Solutions To The Types Of Conduct Exposed In Garlock's Bankruptcy,' Mealey's Asbestos Bankrupcty Report, August 28, 2015
•'Keystone of Justice: The Pennsylvania Superior Court, 1895-1995,' Pennsylvania Press, 2000
Media Commentary
•'Pa. Supreme Court justices rarely lose seats in retention elections, so why is this year's race so important?', Philly Voice, September 29, 2025
•'Monsanto Takes Roundup Preemption Defense to Pennsylvania Supreme Court,' The Legal Intelligencer, August 15, 2025
•'Where Did All of Philadelphia's Big Verdicts Go?' The Legal Intelligencer, July 31, 2025
•'Key Issue in Roundup Litigation Gets First-Time Review From Pa. Appeals Court,' The Legal Intelligencer, March 28, 2025
•'Justices Wary of Overturning Longstanding Precedent on Tort Immunity for General Contractors,' The Legal Intelligencer, March 6, 2025
•'Diving Into a Judicial Hellhole - A look at ATRF’s latest list and examining the top jurisdiction,' CLM Magazine, January 7, 2025
•'Philly and the Pa. Supreme Court Are Top 'Judicial Hellholes,' A Tort Reform Group Says. Trial Attorneys Aren't Happy.' The Philadelphia Inquirer, December 12, 2024.
•'Judge Orders New Trial in Temple Health Medical Malpractice Case with $45 Million Jury Verdict,' The Philadelphia Inquirer, December 11, 2024
•'Turning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops,' The American Lawyer, October 7, 2024
•'Pa. High Court Reversal Rate of Superior Court Rulings Has Plummeted, Report Shows,' The Legal Intelligencer, April 23, 2024
•'As Stakes Escalate, Kline & Specter Begin Stepping in to Defend Phila.’s Largest Verdicts Post-Trial,' The Legal Intelligencer, January 31, 2024
•'Parties Clash Over Jury Instruction in Hearing on $976M Defective Seatbelt Verdict,' The Legal Intelligencer, April 2, 2024
•' Unanimity Is Rare on Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Data Reveals, ' The Legal Intelligencer, February 15, 2024
•' Pennsylvania Litigation To Watch In 2024 ' Law360, January 1, 2024
•' Top Pennsylvania Cases of 2023, ' Law360, December 21, 2023
•''Passion and Prejudice': Mitsubishi Seeks to Overturn Nearly $1B Defective Seatbelt Verdict,' The Legal Intelligencer, November 15, 2023
•' Superior Court Breaks String of Plaintiff-Side Forum Rulings, Upholding Case's Move From Phila .' The Legal Intelligencer, November 1, 2023
•' Could Proposed Changes to Civil Jury Selection Rules Slow Down Pa.'s Courts? ' The Legal Intelligencer, September 21, 2023
•' Pa. Civil Law Has Developed Pro-Plaintiff Slant, PCCJR Panelists Say, ' The Legal Intelligencer, September 11, 2023
•' Jury Verdicts Like the $183 Million Award Against Penn Medicine Can Be Tied Up for Years, But Usually Stand, ' The Philadelphia Inquirer, May 2, 2023
•'PA Budget, Political Appointment Decisions for Gov. Josh Shapiro,' GoErie.com, January 3, 2023
•'Defense Attorneys Brace for Impacts as Medical Malpractice Venue Rule Changes Loom,' The Legal Intelligencer, October 5, 2022
•'Pa. Legal Community Remembers Chief Justice Baer as a Consensus Builder, Family Law Icon,' The Legal Intelligencer, October 3, 2022
•'Lawyers Argue for New Trial, Reduction of $19 Million Verdict for Pool Injury,' The Tribune-Review, August 8, 2022
•'Woman Gifted Groupon Massage Must Arbitrate Assault Claims: Court,' Pennsylvania Law Weekly, August 2, 2022
•'Guns, Abortion & Voting Rights: 5 Critical PA Supreme Court Cases to Keep an Eye on in 2022,' Pocono Record, July 18, 2022
•'Plaintiffs Seek to Narrow Pa. High Court's Ruling Axing Jurisdiction by Business Registration,' The Legal Intelligencer, February 1, 2022
•'Pa. Justices: Defense Attorney's Question During Ex-NFL Player's Med Mal Trial Was Not Improper,' Pennsylvania Law Weekly, December 28, 2021
•'Pa. Justices Say Two Disputed Words Don't Warrant New Trial,' Law360, December 22, 2021
•'Pa. Justices Split Over Whether Two Words Warrant Retrial,' Law360, September 21, 2021
•''Even Bad People': Legal Community Divided on Unpopular Decision That Freed Cosby,' The Legal Intelligencer, July 1, 2021
•'Pa. Cases to Watch in 2021: Midyear Report,' Law360, July 9, 2021
•'Pa. Atty Off Hook for Extended Interest on Malpractice Award,' Law360, March 31, 2021
•'Pa. Justices Snub Appeal Over Axed $40M Spinal Injury Award,' Law360, March 30, 2021
•'Pennsylvania Cases to Watch in 2021,' Law360, January 3, 2021
•'Pa. Court Scraps $40M Suburban Phila. Jury Verdict Over Birth Injury,' The Legal Intelligencer, July 20, 2020
•'Measure to Split Pa. Court Seats Seen as Political Play,' Law360, July 17, 2020
•'Pa. Panel Wipes Out $40M Award for Baby's Spinal Injury,' Law360, July 16, 2020
•'Top Pennsylvania Cases of 2020: A Midyear Report,' Law360, July 2, 2020
•'3rd Circ. Punts Amazon Seller Liability Case to Pa. Justices,' Law360, June 2, 2020
•'Panel Axes $10M Award in Surgery Patient's Drug Death Suit,' Law360, April 9, 2020
•'Pa. Appeals Court Slashes Award; Finds Jury Went Too Far With $10 Million Verdict,' The Legal Intelligencer, April 9, 2020
•'Pennsylvania Cases to Watch in 2020', Law 360, January 3, 2020
•'Drifting Away From Precedent?: Some See Pa. Supreme Court Upending Established Case Law,' Pennsylvania Law Weekly, December 23, 2019
•'The Biggest Pa. Appellate Rulings Of 2019: Midyear Report,' Law360, July 3, 2019
•'Pa. Jurisdiction in Grenfell Tower Suit May be Tested by Evolving Case Law,' The Legal Intelligencer, June 12, 2019
•“Law Firms Going ‘Old School’ as Phila. Court System Struggles to Recover From Computer Virus,” The Legal Intelligencer, May 31, 2019
•'At Last, Unpublished Superior Court Opinions Can Be Cited. Now What?,' The Legal Intelligencer, March 29, 2019
•'This Pennsylvania Committee Is Proposing Changes That Benefit Five Of Its Members' Law Firms,' Forbes and Pennsylvania Record, February 19, 2019
•'Tough Sell On Cancer Link Awaits At 1st Philly Talc Trial,' Law360, February 5, 2019
•'CBS Tells Justices No Liability For Asbestos Added By Others, Law360, September 20, 2018
•'The Biggest Pa. Appellate Rulings Of 2018: Midyear Report,' Law360, July 12, 2018
•'Judge Says Pa.'s Corporate Registration Law Doesn't Create Jurisdiction,' The Legal Intelligencer, June 11, 2018
•'Superior Court Throws Out $32M Wrongful Death Award,' The Legal Intelligencer, May 3, 2018
•'Pa. Tort Ruling Highlights Discrepancies in Jury Instructions,' Law360, February 23, 2018
•'Commonwealth Court: Philly Beverage Tax is Legal,' WHYY's Keystone Crossroads, June 14, 2017. John's interview about the soda tax also aired on WHYY's Morning Edition program on June 16, 2017.
•'Changes to PA Tort Law Not Coming Fast Enough, Attorneys Say,' Law360, April 20, 2017
•'Justices' 'Abnormal' Requests Pose Legislative Challenges,' The Legal Intelligencer, October 7, 2017
•'Attorneys Agree Ban on Citing Nonprecedential Opinions is a Hurdle,' The Legal Intelligencer, September 1, 2016
•'The Biggest PA Appeals Court Decisions So Far in 2016,' Law360, August 4, 2016
•'Appellate Courts Prepare to Transition Interim Appointees,' The Legal Intelligencer, July 11, 2016
•'Zimmer Win May Force Harder Look at Runaway Verdicts,' Law360, June 10, 2016
•''When in Doubt, Appeal' in Consolidated Cases,' The Legal Intelligencer, May 31, 2016
•'Superior Court's 2016 Output Low on Civil Rulings,' The Legal Intelligencer, May 27, 2016
•'Revamped PA High Court Looks To Make Mark on Tort Law,' Law360, February 4, 2016
•'Supreme Court Orders Reargument in 26 Cases From 2015,' The Legal Intelligencer, January 22, 2016.
•'Intermediate Courts Must Weather Vacancies,' The Legal Intelligencer, January 9, 2016
•'Supreme Court Justice J. Michael Eakin Tearfully Apologizes, Defends Reputation in Porn Email Hearing,' Allentown Morning Call, December 21, 2015
•'Eakin, 'Bruno' and the State of Judicial Discipline in PA,' The Legal Intelligencer, December 18, 2015
•'JCB Faces Challenges in Proving Violations by Eakin,' The Legal Intelligencer, December 11, 2015
•'Litigants May Test High Court After Turnover,' Pennsylvania Law Weekly, November 17, 2015
•'Dems' PA High Court Sweep Could Shake Up Enviro, Tort Law,' Law360, November 4, 2015
•'Report: Supreme Court Should Defer to JCB on Eakin Emails,' The Legal Intelligencer, November 3, 2015
•'Zimmer Ruling Continues Pa. Justices' Pro-Plaintiff Trend,' Law360, October 28, 2015
•'Lawyers Say Discipline, Not Removal, Likely for Eakin,' Pennsylvania Law Weekly, October 20, 2015
•'Rekindled Email Scandal Tests State Supreme Court, Again,' The Legal Intelligencer, October 6, 2015
•'Saylor's Comments Raise More Questions Over AG Kane's Fate,' The Legal Intelligencer, September 30, 2015
•'Fee Sanctions Must Be Filed Soon After Final Order,' Pennsylvania Law Weekly, September 28, 2015
•'Rule Changes Clear Up Legal Gray Area in Post-Trial Motions,' Legal Intelligencer, July 14, 2015
•'Raising Pa. Supreme Court Output Easier Said Than Done?,' Pennsylvania Law Weekly, March 31, 2015
•'Police Owe No Duty to Unknown Passengers in Fleeing Car,' The Legal Intelligencer, January 5, 2015
•'Pennsylvania Cases To Watch In 2015,' Law360, January 2, 2015
Results
Favorable Precedential Decision Obtained in High-Stakes Construction Defect Case
We prevailed in a unanimous, precedential decision in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, which reconciled conflicting case law in the state. The plaintiffs were joined by 55 amici, and our client was joined by numerous construction organizations as amici. The court eventually applied Pennsylvania’s statute of repose to bar construction defect claims brought by homeowners.
Pennsylvania Appellate Courts Uphold Nonsuit Obtained By Jack Delany In $11.5 Million Construction Death Case
By Order dated April 5, 2023, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania refused to review the Superior Court’s affirmance of a 2021 nonsuit obtained by Jack Delany in hotly contested litigation stemming from the death of a construction worker. John Hare and Shane Haselbarth handled the appeal along with Jack.The Supreme Court’s ruling ends more than five years of litigation that arose from the construction worker’s death while he was involved in the Pier 78 renovation project on the Delaware River in Philadelphia. The plaintiff sued the general contractor and others involved in the project and ultimately settled with the general contractor for $10.5 million. The general contractor then pursued a contractual indemnification claim against Jack Delany’s concrete subcontractor client on the Pier 78 project. The indemnification claim included the $10.5 million settlement plus approximately $1 million in attorneys’ fees. The case proceeded to trial in 2021 and, at the close of the general contractor’s case-in-chief, Jack moved for and was granted a nonsuit on the basis that the general contractor was the deceased construction workers’ statutory employer pursuant to the five-element test set forth by the PA Supreme Court in McDonald v. Levinson Steel, 153 A. 424 (Pa. 1930). The case was especially notable because, rather than retaining an attorney to address the reasonableness of the amount of the underlying settlement, which is typical, Jack retained an economist to explain that, based upon his analysis of comparable cases, the settlement amount was excessive.The general contractor appealed the nonsuit. In an unanimous decision dated September 30, 2022, the Superior Court affirmed. The Supreme Court denial of allowance of appeal brings the lengthy litigation to an end.
Thought Leadership
Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly
What Lawyers Can Do to Protect and Promote Judicial Independence
January 1, 2026
Lawyers have a special obligation and opportunity to safeguard judicial independence through advocacy and by avoiding and condemning attacks on courts and jurists.
Podcast/Webinar
Combatting Nuclear Verdicts in Plaintiff-Friendly Jurisdictions
October 30, 2025
In this podcast epis
John's approach to appellate cases
John is a member of Marshall Dennehey's three-person Executive Committee, which is responsible for the firm’s daily operations and management of more than 500 attorneys across 19 offices in seven states. He also serves on the firm’s Board of Directors and as chair of the fifteen-attorney Appellate Advocacy & Post-Trial Practice. As appellate counsel, John has litigated more than 500 appeals in…
The kind of cases John takes
John reviews new inquiries case-by-case for appellate and general matters in Philadelphia and the surrounding Pennsylvania area.
Credentials
Education, bar admissions, and languages
Thomas R. Kline Schoo of Law of Duquesne University
J.D. · 1993
Princeton University
coursework completed for Ph.D. University of California, Berkeley Class of 1998 M.A. Editor, Duquesn · 1999
John studied at J.D. in Thomas R. Kline Schoo of Law of Duquesne University and coursework completed for Ph.D. University of California, Berkeley Class of 1998 M.A. Editor, Duquesn in Princeton University.
Law school and academic background
John completed J.D. in Thomas R. Kline Schoo of Law of Duquesne University and coursework completed for Ph.D. University of California, Berkeley Class of 1998 M.A. Editor, Duquesn in Princeton University. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice John runs in Pennsylvania is where that training gets applied to real client questions.
Recognition
Recognition and thought leadership
John has received 1 formal recognition from bar associations, industry bodies, and peer-review services.
AV Preeminent
Legal awards and honors
AV Preeminent.
Locations
John J. Hare's office in Philadelphia
John's primary office is at 2000 Market Street, Suite 2300, Philadelphia, PA, 19103. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.
Client feedback
Client reviews of John J. Hare — 5.0/5 rating from 19 verified client reviews
Every review below is from a verified client of John. Reviews cover communication, case outcome, and value — the three signals that matter most when comparing appellate attorneys in Philadelphia.
5.0
19 client reviews
Client ratings are sourced from public records and editorial research. Reviews on LawyersListed are accepted from verified clients once John J. Hare claims this profile.
Read all reviewsHiring guide
How to hire John J. Hare — what to expect in your first consultation
Working with a new appellate attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with John usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.
Consultation formats and pricing
John charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain John's office.
What to bring to your first meeting
Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; John will tell you what matters and what doesn't.
Questions to ask a appellate attorney in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
A short list to run through before you commit: How many appellate matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?
Fees & payment
Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for John
John discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in appellate practice — ask which fits.
Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options
Every appellate matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. John confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.
Payment methods and payment plans
John's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many appellate practices work with clients on structured schedules.
Frequently asked
Frequently asked questions about John J. Hare
How much does it cost to hire John for a appellate case?
Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. John walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.
Does John offer a free consultation?
John charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain John's office. Some appellate attorneys offer free consults — check John's current terms during booking.
How long do appellate cases in Pennsylvania typically take?
Simple appellate matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. John gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.
Can John take my case if I'm outside Philadelphia?
John is licensed in Pennsylvania. Matters governed by Pennsylvania law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — John will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.
What should I bring to my first meeting with John?
Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. John will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.
Is John accepting new appellate clients right now?
John's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.
Areas served
Appellate attorneys serving Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Harrisburg in Pennsylvania
John handles appellate matters throughout Pennsylvania. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified appellate attorneys in that community.
More counsel
Other top-rated appellate attorneys in Pennsylvania
If John's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these appellate attorneys in Philadelphia handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.

T.L. Kearney IV
York, Pennsylvania
5.0· 231

Carlo A. LaMonica
Moscow, Pennsylvania
5.0· 134

Jerry Robert Knafo
Allentown, Pennsylvania
5.0· 60

Jennifer Gilliland Vanasdale Esquire
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania
5.0· 47

Gary Green
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
5.0· 47

Michael Anthony O'Donnell
Kingston, Pennsylvania
5.0· 43