Phillip V. Marano, Entertainment Attorney in Washington, District of Columbia
Over 19 years of legal practice · focused on Entertainment, General, and IP
Of CounselatGreenberg Traurig Llp
Washington, DC
Practicing entertainment in Washington since 2007.
- 19+
- Years practicing
- 3
- Bar admissions
Practices in
Are you Phillip V. Marano?
This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.
Quick answer
Phillip V. Marano is an of counsel based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on Entertainment, General, and IP. Phillip has over 19 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Greenberg Traurig Llp.
- Based in
- Washington, DC
- Experience
- over 19 years
- Known for
- Entertainment · General · IP
- Handles Entertainment, General, and IP matters from Washington, DC.
- Over 19 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
About Phillip V. Marano: Phillip V. Marano is an of counsel based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on Entertainment, General, and IP. Phillip has over 19 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Greenberg Traurig Llp.
Areas of practice
Phillip's practice areas in Washington
Phillip concentrates on entertainment, general, ip, trademark, and internet. Each area below outlines the kind of case Phillip handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.
Entertainment
View other Entertainment attorneys
General
View other General attorneys
IP
View other IP attorneys
Trademark
View other Trademark attorneys
Internet
View other Internet attorneys
Entertainment cases in Washington, District of Columbia
Phillip takes entertainment matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Phillip agrees to represent you.
General cases in Washington, District of Columbia
Phillip takes general matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Phillip agrees to represent you.
IP cases in Washington, District of Columbia
Phillip takes ip matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Phillip agrees to represent you.
Trademark cases in Washington, District of Columbia
Phillip takes trademark matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Phillip agrees to represent you.
Internet cases in Washington, District of Columbia
Phillip takes internet matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Phillip agrees to represent you.
Biography
Phillip V. Marano, entertainment attorney serving Washington
Phillip V. Marano is an of counsel based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on Entertainment, General, and IP. Phillip has over 19 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Greenberg Traurig Llp. Phillip works from Washington, District of Columbia and takes on entertainment matters across the region.
Phillip V. Marano has spent the last fifteen years advising clients on legal matters at the intersection of intellectual property and the Internet. He works with global clients across all industries, with a focus in the cybersecurity, entertainment, domain name, nonprofit, social media, and technology sectors. He advises clients on virtually all manner of internet and intellectual property-related matters.
Online Enforcement Services
Drawing on his deep knowledge of the Internet and broad network of vendors and intermediary contacts, Phil develops, executes, and oversees expansive programs to combat all manner of illegal conduct on the Internet, including cybersquatting, phishing and other forms of malicious conduct, sale of counterfeit goods, trademark infringement and dilution, copyright piracy and infringement, terms of service violations, impersonation, and all manner of fraud. He deanonymizes bad actors and shuts down or seizes the Internet resources that they rely upon. Phil has recovered or disabled thousands of problematic domain names, social media accounts, email addresses, websites and other online content, using approaches ranging from informal requests to platforms, to arbitration under the Uniform Domain Name Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), to litigation under the US Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA). Since 2019, Phil has also served as an arbitration panelist for the UDRP, deciding domain name disputes for the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
Internet Policy and Domain Name Counseling Services
For as long as he has been in practice, Phil has actively shaped Internet policy through his participation in the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). He routinely counsels and collaborates with clients on all manner of policies, regulations, and legislation impacting the Internet, with a particular emphasis on the domain name system. Phil regularly partners with Internet intermediaries to identify and limit their liability, determine acceptable legal and compliance risks, and align their legal strategies with their business goals. Phil is one of only a handful of attorneys worldwide who has assisted his clients through the successful application, evaluation, dispute resolution, contracting, delegation, and operation phases of over two-hundred new generic Top-Level Domain Names (gTLDs). He also manages global domain name portfolios for his clients, and has developed and executed strategies for the acquisition, management, and operation of all manner of domain names.
Intellectual Property Prosecution and Brick-And-Mortar Enforcement Services
Phil handles all aspects of global copyright and trademark selection, clearance, prosecution, management, and enforcement. He provides regulatory and litigation counseling on all manner of trademark, copyright, social media, ecommerce, intermediary liability, and right of publicity matters. Phil has litigated cancellation and opposition proceedings before the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. And he has negotiated a wide array of coexistence, consent, and settlement agreements.
Licensing, Ecommerce, and Transactional Services
Phil routinely drafts and negotiates agreements related to the creation, licensing, and assignment of rights in intellectual property, data, domain names, and various other technologies and intangible assets. He handles all manner of high-value technology licenses, vendor service agreements, sponsorship agreements, naming rights agreements, confidentiality agreements, escrow agreements, and auction agreements, as well as website policies, terms and conditions.
Other Services
Phil is embedded in the legal department of an international trade association that focuses on information technology and cybersecurity and offers a number of well-known certifications and educational products and services. In that role, Phil handles all manner of intellectual property licensing and commercial transactions, and Phil also helps oversee their global trademark and copyright prosecution and enforcement matters. In addition, Phil is also embedded in the in-house legal team for one of the largest technology companies in the world.
The attorney is providing legal services through and affiliated with Greenberg Traurig, LLP, a New York Limited Liability Partnership. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Recognition & Leadership
Awards & Accolades
•Team Member, a U.S. News - Best Lawyers 'Law Firm of the Year' in Trademark Law, 2020
How Phillip handles entertainment matters
Phillip V. Marano has spent the last fifteen years advising clients on legal matters at the intersection of intellectual property and the Internet. He works with global clients across all industries, with a focus in the cybersecurity, entertainment, domain name, nonprofit, social media, and technology sectors. He advises clients on virtually all manner of internet and intellectual…
The kind of cases Phillip takes
Phillip reviews new inquiries case-by-case for entertainment, general, and ip matters in Washington and the surrounding District of Columbia area.
Credentials
Credentials — where Phillip studied and practices
The George Washington University Law School
LL.M. Intellectual · 2009
The College of New Jersey
B.S. · 2004
Jurisdictions
Phillip's state bar admissions
District of Columbia
2009 · ACTIVE
New York
2008 · ACTIVE
New Jersey
2007 · ACTIVE
Phillip studied at LL.M. Intellectual in The George Washington University Law School and B.S. in The College of New Jersey.
Law school and academic background
Phillip completed LL.M. Intellectual in The George Washington University Law School and B.S. in The College of New Jersey. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Phillip runs in District of Columbia is where that training gets applied to real client questions.
Locations
Phillip V. Marano's office in Washington
Phillip's primary office is at 2101 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000, Washington, DC, 20037. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.
Greenberg Traurig Llp
2101 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20037
Open in Google MapsClient feedback
Client reviews of Phillip V. Marano
Phillip has not yet collected verified client reviews on LawyersListed. Reviews here are all from confirmed clients; anonymous ratings are moderated out.
No reviews yet
Only verified clients who have consulted with Phillip V. Marano can leave a review.
Schedule your consultationHiring guide
How to hire Phillip V. Marano — what to expect in your first consultation
Working with a new entertainment attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Phillip usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.
Consultation formats and pricing
Phillip charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Phillip's office.
What to bring to your first meeting
Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Phillip will tell you what matters and what doesn't.
Questions to ask a entertainment attorney in Washington, District of Columbia
A short list to run through before you commit: How many entertainment matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?
Fees & payment
Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Phillip
Phillip discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in entertainment practice — ask which fits.
Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options
Every entertainment matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Phillip confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.
Payment methods and payment plans
Phillip's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many entertainment practices work with clients on structured schedules.
Frequently asked
Frequently asked questions about Phillip V. Marano
How much does it cost to hire Phillip for a entertainment case?
Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Phillip walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.
Does Phillip offer a free consultation?
Phillip charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Phillip's office. Some entertainment attorneys offer free consults — check Phillip's current terms during booking.
How long do entertainment cases in District of Columbia typically take?
Simple entertainment matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Phillip gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.
Can Phillip take my case if I'm outside Washington?
Phillip is licensed in District of Columbia. Matters governed by District of Columbia law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Phillip will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.
What should I bring to my first meeting with Phillip?
Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Phillip will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.
Is Phillip accepting new entertainment clients right now?
Phillip's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.
Areas served
Entertainment attorneys serving Washington and Belize City in District of Columbia
Phillip handles entertainment matters throughout District of Columbia. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified entertainment attorneys in that community.
More counsel
Other top-rated entertainment attorneys in District of Columbia
If Phillip's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these entertainment attorneys in Washington handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.

Bridget Michael Rohde
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 22

Cameron Hajaran Tousi
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 21

Joseph John Bottiglieri
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 20

Martin Jacobs
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 18

David Franklin Freeman, Jr.
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 16

Elizabeth Carrott Minnigh
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 15