
Richard M. Firestone, Entertainment Attorney in Washington, District of Columbia
Over 53 years of legal practice · focused on Entertainment, General, and Government · 5.0/5 rating from 1 verified client review
PartneratArnold And Porter Llp
Washington, DC
Practicing entertainment in Washington since 1973.
- 53+
- Years practicing
- 5.0 ★
- 1 client review
- 4
- Bar admissions
Practices in
Are you Richard M. Firestone?
This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.
Quick answer
Richard M. Firestone is a partner based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on Entertainment, General, and Government. Richard has over 53 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Arnold And Porter Llp. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.
- Based in
- Washington, DC
- Experience
- over 53 years
- Known for
- Entertainment · General · Government
- Handles Entertainment, General, and Government matters from Washington, DC.
- Over 53 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
- Recognized with AV Preeminent.
About Richard M. Firestone: Richard M. Firestone is a partner based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on Entertainment, General, and Government. Richard has over 53 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Arnold And Porter Llp. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.
Areas of practice
Legal matters Richard takes on
Richard concentrates on entertainment, general, government, and international. Each area below outlines the kind of case Richard handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.
Entertainment
View other Entertainment attorneys
General
View other General attorneys
Government
View other Government attorneys
International
View other International attorneys
Entertainment cases in Washington, District of Columbia
Richard takes entertainment matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Richard agrees to represent you.
General cases in Washington, District of Columbia
Richard takes general matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Richard agrees to represent you.
Government cases in Washington, District of Columbia
Richard takes government matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Richard agrees to represent you.
International cases in Washington, District of Columbia
Richard takes international matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Richard agrees to represent you.
Biography
Meet Richard M. Firestone — entertainment lawyer in Washington
Richard M. Firestone is a partner based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on Entertainment, General, and Government. Richard has over 53 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Arnold And Porter Llp. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.
Richard M. Firestone is a lawyer practicing telecommunications, communications and media, international and 1 other area of law. Richard M. received a B.A. degree from University of Michigan in 1970, and has been licensed for 53 years. Richard M. practices at Arnold & Porter LLP in Washington, DC.
Working with Richard on a entertainment matter
Richard M. Firestone is a lawyer practicing telecommunications, communications and media, international and 1 other area of law. Richard M. received a B.A. degree from University of Michigan in 1970, and has been licensed for 53 years. Richard M. practices at Arnold & Porter LLP in Washington, DC.
Clients Richard works with
Richard reviews new inquiries case-by-case for entertainment, general, and government matters in Washington and the surrounding District of Columbia area.
Credentials
Education, bar admissions, and languages
University of Michigan
J.D. · 1973
University of Michigan
B.A. · 1970
Jurisdictions
Richard's state bar admissions
U.S. Supreme Court
1986 · ACTIVE
District of Columbia
1981 · ACTIVE
Michigan
1974 · ACTIVE
Ohio
1973 · ACTIVE
Richard studied at J.D. in University of Michigan and B.A. in University of Michigan.
Law school and academic background
Richard completed J.D. in University of Michigan and B.A. in University of Michigan. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Richard runs in District of Columbia is where that training gets applied to real client questions.
Recognition
Recognition and thought leadership
Richard has received 1 formal recognition from bar associations, industry bodies, and peer-review services.
AV Preeminent
Legal awards and honors
AV Preeminent.
Affiliations
Richard's professional memberships and bar associations
American Bar Association Federal Communications Bar Association
membership
Locations
Richard M. Firestone's office in Washington
Richard's primary office is at 601 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Washington, DC, 20001. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.
Client feedback
Client reviews of Richard M. Firestone — 5.0/5 rating from 1 verified client review
Every review below is from a verified client of Richard. Reviews cover communication, case outcome, and value — the three signals that matter most when comparing entertainment attorneys in Washington.
5.0
1 client review
Client ratings are sourced from public records and editorial research. Reviews on LawyersListed are accepted from verified clients once Richard M. Firestone claims this profile.
Read all reviewsHiring guide
How to hire Richard M. Firestone — what to expect in your first consultation
Working with a new entertainment attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Richard usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.
Consultation formats and pricing
Richard charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Richard's office.
What to bring to your first meeting
Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Richard will tell you what matters and what doesn't.
Questions to ask a entertainment attorney in Washington, District of Columbia
A short list to run through before you commit: How many entertainment matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?
Fees & payment
Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Richard
Richard discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in entertainment practice — ask which fits.
Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options
Every entertainment matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Richard confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.
Payment methods and payment plans
Richard's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many entertainment practices work with clients on structured schedules.
Frequently asked
Frequently asked questions about Richard M. Firestone
How much does it cost to hire Richard for a entertainment case?
Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Richard walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.
Does Richard offer a free consultation?
Richard charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Richard's office. Some entertainment attorneys offer free consults — check Richard's current terms during booking.
How long do entertainment cases in District of Columbia typically take?
Simple entertainment matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Richard gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.
Can Richard take my case if I'm outside Washington?
Richard is licensed in District of Columbia. Matters governed by District of Columbia law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Richard will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.
What should I bring to my first meeting with Richard?
Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Richard will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.
Is Richard accepting new entertainment clients right now?
Richard's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.
Areas served
Entertainment attorneys serving Washington and Belize City in District of Columbia
Richard handles entertainment matters throughout District of Columbia. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified entertainment attorneys in that community.
More counsel
Other top-rated entertainment attorneys in District of Columbia
If Richard's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these entertainment attorneys in Washington handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.

Bridget Michael Rohde
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 22

Joseph John Bottiglieri
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 20

Martin Jacobs
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 18

David Franklin Freeman, Jr.
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 16

Elizabeth Carrott Minnigh
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 15

Russell Randle
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 14