Richard Maxwell Mauldin, IP Attorney in Atlanta, Georgia
Over 8 years of legal practice
AssociateatGreenberg Traurig, LLP
Atlanta, GA
Practicing ip in Atlanta since 2018.
- 8+
- Years practicing
- 2
- Bar admissions
Practices in
Are you Richard Maxwell Mauldin?
This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.
Quick answer
Richard Maxwell Mauldin is an associate based in Atlanta, GA. The practice focuses on IP. Richard has over 8 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
- Based in
- Atlanta, GA
- Experience
- over 8 years
- Known for
- IP
- Handles IP matters from Atlanta, GA.
- Over 8 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
About Richard Maxwell Mauldin: Richard Maxwell Mauldin is an associate based in Atlanta, GA. The practice focuses on IP. Richard has over 8 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
Areas of practice
Practice areas handled by Richard Maxwell Mauldin
Richard concentrates on ip. Each area below outlines the kind of case Richard handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.
IP cases in Atlanta, Georgia
Richard takes ip matters in Atlanta, Georgia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Richard agrees to represent you.
Biography
About Richard Maxwell Mauldin — Over 8 years of Georgia ip experience
Richard Maxwell Mauldin is an associate based in Atlanta, GA. The practice focuses on IP. Richard has over 8 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
Max’s practice primarily focuses on intellectual property creation, counseling, and disputes, particularly within the areas of patent prosecution and litigation. His practice extends to a wide variety of complex technologies, including robotics, consumer electronics, electric motors, semiconductor devices, financial technology, artificial intelligence applications, blockchain systems, telecommunications, vehicle and aircraft control systems, and hybrid/electric vehicles. Max has managed the creation of patents and disputes for his clients in these technologies and more.
Max’s litigation experience informs his patent creation and portfolio management expertise, allowing him to guide clients on the impact and reach of their products and intellectual property. Max has gained his litigation experience by challenging and defending patents among a variety of forums, including in post-grant proceedings at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the International Trade Commission (ITC), federal district courts across the U.S., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court. In the USPTO, Max has participated in dozens of Inter Partes Review (IPR) and Ex Parte Reexamination proceedings. In district court and ITC proceedings, his litigation experience ranges from pre-suit planning and strategy to motion practice, discovery, depositions, claim construction, summary judgment, trial, and post-trial briefing.
In addition to his patent work, Max has counseled clients in the creation and protection of trademarks and trade secrets. Max has also participated in the negotiation and execution of intellectual property agreements and contracts to resolve or pre-empt disputes.
Max’s engineering background is based on designing and overseeing the implementation of various systems, including suspension, powertrain, and software systems, for vehicles and aircraft. He gained practical knowledge as a design and strength engineer for two aircraft manufacturing companies.
Max is committed to providing quality pro bono legal aid. He consistently takes on a diverse range of projects to provide support for those in need.
Experience
Representative Matters
• In the Matter of Certain Power Inverters and Converters, Vehicles Containing the Same, and Components Thereof: Represented BMW through trial, resulting in finding non-infringement of BMW’s products and invalidity of plaintiff’s patent.°
• Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology: Joined the matter after a TCL received a judgment of willful infringement, which resulted in a damages award of over $110 million. Convinced the Federal Circuit that the claims were patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101, and the court reversed the district court’s ruling of no invalidity, vacated the entire judgment against TCL, and awarded costs to TCL. Based on that award, further persuaded the Eastern District of Texas to tax $2.35 million in costs.°
• Nissei ASB Co., et al. v. R&D Tool & Engineering Co.
• Tcl Commc’n Tech. Holdings, Ltd. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson: Drafted briefing and second-chaired oral argument that led to reverse of $75 million verdict, and subsequently drafted briefing to defend Federal Circuit decision against a petition for writ of cert. to the Supreme Court.°
°The above representations were handled by Mr. Mauldin prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
Previous Experience
• University of Missouri, 2016-2017
o Intellectual Property Licensing Assistant, 2016-2017
• Boeing, 2012-2015
o Mechanical Design and Analysis Engineer for F-15, F/A-18 Aircraft, 2013-2015
o Mechanical Design and Analysis Engineer for Aircraft Simulators, 2012-2013
• Mechanical Design Engineer, ERAU, Polaris, and QINETIQ Partnership, 2011-2012
• Fuel & Power Plant Design Engineer on the Piperjet Altaire, New Piper Aircraft Inc., 2010-2011
Recognition & Leadership
Awards & Accolades
• Listed, Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll, High Honors, 2020-2022
• Listed, Pro Bono Resource Center of the State Bar of Georgia, “Pro Bono All-Stars,” 2019
Professional & Community Involvement
• Member, American Bar Association, 2018-Present
Working with Richard on a ip matter
Max’s practice primarily focuses on intellectual property creation, counseling, and disputes, particularly within the areas of patent prosecution and litigation. His practice extends to a wide variety of complex technologies, including robotics, consumer electronics, electric motors, semiconductor devices, financial technology, artificial intelligence applications, blockchain systems,…
Clients Richard works with
Richard reviews new inquiries case-by-case for ip matters in Atlanta and the surrounding Georgia area.
Credentials
Richard Maxwell Mauldin's legal education and bar admissions
University of Missouri School of Law J.D. cum laude
—
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University M.S. Mechanical Engineering, cum laude Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University B.S. Mechanical Engineering, cum laude
—
Jurisdictions
Richard's state bar admissions
District of Columbia
2020 · ACTIVE
Georgia
2018 · ACTIVE
Richard studied at — in University of Missouri School of Law J.D. cum laude and — in Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University M.S. Mechanical Engineering, cum laude Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University B.S. Mechanical Engineering, cum laude.
Law school and academic background
Richard completed — in University of Missouri School of Law J.D. cum laude and — in Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University M.S. Mechanical Engineering, cum laude Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University B.S. Mechanical Engineering, cum laude. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Richard runs in Georgia is where that training gets applied to real client questions.
Affiliations
Richard's professional memberships and bar associations
American Bar Association
membership
Locations
Richard Maxwell Mauldin's office in Atlanta
Richard's primary office is at Terminus 200, Terminus 200, 3333 Piedmont Road NE, Suite 2500, Atlanta, GA, 30305. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Terminus 200, Terminus 200, 3333 Piedmont Road NE, Suite 2500
Atlanta, GA 30305
Open in Google MapsClient feedback
Client reviews of Richard Maxwell Mauldin
Richard has not yet collected verified client reviews on LawyersListed. Reviews here are all from confirmed clients; anonymous ratings are moderated out.
No reviews yet
Only verified clients who have consulted with Richard Maxwell Mauldin can leave a review.
Schedule your consultationHiring guide
How to hire Richard Maxwell Mauldin — what to expect in your first consultation
Working with a new ip attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Richard usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.
Consultation formats and pricing
Richard charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Richard's office.
What to bring to your first meeting
Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Richard will tell you what matters and what doesn't.
Questions to ask a ip attorney in Atlanta, Georgia
A short list to run through before you commit: How many ip matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?
Fees & payment
Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Richard
Richard discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in ip practice — ask which fits.
Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options
Every ip matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Richard confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.
Payment methods and payment plans
Richard's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many ip practices work with clients on structured schedules.
Frequently asked
Frequently asked questions about Richard Maxwell Mauldin
How much does it cost to hire Richard for a ip case?
Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Richard walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.
Does Richard offer a free consultation?
Richard charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Richard's office. Some ip attorneys offer free consults — check Richard's current terms during booking.
How long do ip cases in Georgia typically take?
Simple ip matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Richard gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.
Can Richard take my case if I'm outside Atlanta?
Richard is licensed in Georgia. Matters governed by Georgia law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Richard will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.
What should I bring to my first meeting with Richard?
Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Richard will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.
Is Richard accepting new ip clients right now?
Richard's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.
Areas served
IP attorneys serving Atlanta, Marietta and Savannah in Georgia
Richard handles ip matters throughout Georgia. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified ip attorneys in that community.
More counsel
Other top-rated ip attorneys in Georgia
If Richard's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these ip attorneys in Atlanta handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.
