Scott Philip Armstrong, Litigation Attorney in Washington, District of Columbia
Over 17 years of legal practice
Associate
Washington, DC
Practicing litigation in Washington since 2009.
- 17+
- Years practicing
- 2
- Bar admissions
Practices in
Are you Scott Philip Armstrong?
This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.
Quick answer
Scott Philip Armstrong is an associate based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on Litigation. Scott has over 17 years of legal experience.
- Based in
- Washington, DC
- Experience
- over 17 years
- Known for
- Litigation
- Handles Litigation matters from Washington, DC.
- Over 17 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
About Scott Philip Armstrong: Scott Philip Armstrong is an associate based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on Litigation. Scott has over 17 years of legal experience.
Areas of practice
Scott's practice areas in Washington
Scott concentrates on litigation. Each area below outlines the kind of case Scott handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.
Litigation cases in Washington, District of Columbia
Scott takes litigation matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Scott agrees to represent you.
Biography
Scott Philip Armstrong, litigation attorney serving Washington
Scott Philip Armstrong is an associate based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on Litigation. Scott has over 17 years of legal experience. Scott works from Washington, District of Columbia and takes on litigation matters across the region.
Scott Philip Armstrong is a lawyer practicing litigation. Scott received a B.A. degree from Tufts University in 2006, and has been licensed for 17 years. Scott practices at Steptoe LLP in Washington, DC.
How Scott handles litigation matters
Scott Philip Armstrong is a lawyer practicing litigation. Scott received a B.A. degree from Tufts University in 2006, and has been licensed for 17 years. Scott practices at Steptoe LLP in Washington, DC.
Who Scott represents
Scott reviews new inquiries case-by-case for litigation matters in Washington and the surrounding District of Columbia area.
Credentials
Credentials — where Scott studied and practices
The George Washington University School of Law
J.D. · 2009
Tufts University
B.A. Political · 2006
Jurisdictions
Scott's state bar admissions
District of Columbia
2010 · ACTIVE
Maryland
2009 · ACTIVE
Scott studied at J.D. in The George Washington University School of Law and B.A. Political in Tufts University.
Law school and academic background
Scott completed J.D. in The George Washington University School of Law and B.A. Political in Tufts University. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Scott runs in District of Columbia is where that training gets applied to real client questions.
Locations
Scott Philip Armstrong's office in Washington
Scott's primary office is at 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20036. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.
Client feedback
Client reviews of Scott Philip Armstrong
Scott has not yet collected verified client reviews on LawyersListed. Reviews here are all from confirmed clients; anonymous ratings are moderated out.
No reviews yet
Only verified clients who have consulted with Scott Philip Armstrong can leave a review.
Schedule your consultationHiring guide
How to hire Scott Philip Armstrong — what to expect in your first consultation
Working with a new litigation attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Scott usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.
Consultation formats and pricing
Scott charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Scott's office.
What to bring to your first meeting
Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Scott will tell you what matters and what doesn't.
Questions to ask a litigation attorney in Washington, District of Columbia
A short list to run through before you commit: How many litigation matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?
Fees & payment
Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Scott
Scott discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in litigation practice — ask which fits.
Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options
Every litigation matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Scott confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.
Payment methods and payment plans
Scott's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many litigation practices work with clients on structured schedules.
Frequently asked
Frequently asked questions about Scott Philip Armstrong
How much does it cost to hire Scott for a litigation case?
Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Scott walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.
Does Scott offer a free consultation?
Scott charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Scott's office. Some litigation attorneys offer free consults — check Scott's current terms during booking.
How long do litigation cases in District of Columbia typically take?
Simple litigation matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Scott gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.
Can Scott take my case if I'm outside Washington?
Scott is licensed in District of Columbia. Matters governed by District of Columbia law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Scott will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.
What should I bring to my first meeting with Scott?
Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Scott will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.
Is Scott accepting new litigation clients right now?
Scott's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.
Areas served
Litigation attorneys serving Washington and Belize City in District of Columbia
Scott handles litigation matters throughout District of Columbia. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified litigation attorneys in that community.
More counsel
Other top-rated litigation attorneys in District of Columbia
If Scott's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these litigation attorneys in Washington handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.

Steven A Fredley
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 29

Bridget Michael Rohde
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 22

Cameron Hajaran Tousi
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 21

Joseph John Bottiglieri
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 20

David Franklin Freeman, Jr.
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 16

Gregory S Smith
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 15