SP

Scott Philip Armstrong, Litigation Attorney in Washington, District of Columbia

Over 17 years of legal practice

Associate

Washington, DC

Practicing litigation in Washington since 2009.

17+
Years practicing
2
Bar admissions

Practices in

Are you Scott Philip Armstrong?

This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.

Claim this profile — free

Quick answer

Scott Philip Armstrong is an associate based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on Litigation. Scott has over 17 years of legal experience.

Based in
Washington, DC
Experience
over 17 years
Known for
Litigation
  • Handles Litigation matters from Washington, DC.
  • Over 17 years of practice as a licensed attorney.

About Scott Philip Armstrong: Scott Philip Armstrong is an associate based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on Litigation. Scott has over 17 years of legal experience.

Areas of practice

Scott's practice areas in Washington

Scott concentrates on litigation. Each area below outlines the kind of case Scott handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.

Litigation cases in Washington, District of Columbia

Scott takes litigation matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Scott agrees to represent you.

Biography

Scott Philip Armstrong, litigation attorney serving Washington

Scott Philip Armstrong is an associate based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on Litigation. Scott has over 17 years of legal experience. Scott works from Washington, District of Columbia and takes on litigation matters across the region.

Scott Philip Armstrong is a lawyer practicing litigation. Scott received a B.A. degree from Tufts University in 2006, and has been licensed for 17 years. Scott practices at Steptoe LLP in Washington, DC.

How Scott handles litigation matters

Scott Philip Armstrong is a lawyer practicing litigation. Scott received a B.A. degree from Tufts University in 2006, and has been licensed for 17 years. Scott practices at Steptoe LLP in Washington, DC.

Who Scott represents

Scott reviews new inquiries case-by-case for litigation matters in Washington and the surrounding District of Columbia area.

Credentials

Credentials — where Scott studied and practices

  • The George Washington University School of Law

    J.D. · 2009

  • Tufts University

    B.A. Political · 2006

Jurisdictions

Scott's state bar admissions

  • District of Columbia

    2010 · ACTIVE

  • Maryland

    2009 · ACTIVE

Scott studied at J.D. in The George Washington University School of Law and B.A. Political in Tufts University.

Law school and academic background

Scott completed J.D. in The George Washington University School of Law and B.A. Political in Tufts University. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Scott runs in District of Columbia is where that training gets applied to real client questions.

Locations

Scott Philip Armstrong's office in Washington

Scott's primary office is at 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20036. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.

Main office

1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20036

Open in Google Maps

Client feedback

Client reviews of Scott Philip Armstrong

Scott has not yet collected verified client reviews on LawyersListed. Reviews here are all from confirmed clients; anonymous ratings are moderated out.

No reviews yet

Only verified clients who have consulted with Scott Philip Armstrong can leave a review.

Schedule your consultation

Hiring guide

How to hire Scott Philip Armstrong — what to expect in your first consultation

Working with a new litigation attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Scott usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.

Consultation formats and pricing

Scott charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Scott's office.

What to bring to your first meeting

Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Scott will tell you what matters and what doesn't.

Questions to ask a litigation attorney in Washington, District of Columbia

A short list to run through before you commit: How many litigation matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?

Fees & payment

Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Scott

Scott discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in litigation practice — ask which fits.

Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options

Every litigation matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Scott confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.

Payment methods and payment plans

Scott's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many litigation practices work with clients on structured schedules.

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about Scott Philip Armstrong

  • How much does it cost to hire Scott for a litigation case?

    Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Scott walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.

  • Does Scott offer a free consultation?

    Scott charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Scott's office. Some litigation attorneys offer free consults — check Scott's current terms during booking.

  • How long do litigation cases in District of Columbia typically take?

    Simple litigation matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Scott gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.

  • Can Scott take my case if I'm outside Washington?

    Scott is licensed in District of Columbia. Matters governed by District of Columbia law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Scott will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.

  • What should I bring to my first meeting with Scott?

    Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Scott will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.

  • Is Scott accepting new litigation clients right now?

    Scott's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.

Areas served

Litigation attorneys serving Washington and Belize City in District of Columbia

Scott handles litigation matters throughout District of Columbia. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified litigation attorneys in that community.

More counsel

If Scott's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these litigation attorneys in Washington handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.