John S. Monical

John S. Monical, Litigation Attorney in Chicago, Illinois

Over 32 years of legal practice · focused on Litigation, Product Liability, and Securities · 5.0/5 rating from 16 verified client reviews

Managing PartneratLawrence Kamin, LLC

Chicago, IL

Practicing litigation in Chicago since 1994.

32+
Years practicing
5.0 ★
16 client reviews
3
Bar admissions

Are you John S. Monical?

This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.

Claim this profile — free

Quick answer

John S. Monical is a managing partner based in Chicago, IL. The practice focuses on Litigation, Product Liability, and Securities. John has over 32 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Lawrence Kamin, LLC. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 16 client reviews.

Based in
Chicago, IL
Experience
over 32 years
Known for
Litigation · Product Liability · Securities
  • Handles Litigation, Product Liability, and Securities matters from Chicago, IL.
  • Over 32 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
  • Recognized with AV Preeminent.

About John S. Monical: John S. Monical is a managing partner based in Chicago, IL. The practice focuses on Litigation, Product Liability, and Securities. John has over 32 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Lawrence Kamin, LLC. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 16 client reviews.

Areas of practice

Legal matters John takes on

John concentrates on litigation, product liability, and securities. Each area below outlines the kind of case John handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.

Litigation cases in Chicago, Illinois

John takes litigation matters in Chicago, Illinois. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before John agrees to represent you.

Product Liability cases in Chicago, Illinois

John takes product liability matters in Chicago, Illinois. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before John agrees to represent you.

Securities cases in Chicago, Illinois

John takes securities matters in Chicago, Illinois. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before John agrees to represent you.

Biography

Meet John S. Monical — litigation lawyer in Chicago

John S. Monical is a managing partner based in Chicago, IL. The practice focuses on Litigation, Product Liability, and Securities. John has over 32 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Lawrence Kamin, LLC. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 16 client reviews.

John S. Monical, Lawrence Kamin's managing partner, has been with the firm since 1998. His primary area of practice is litigation, including representing the financial services industry in regulatory investigations, arbitration, mediation and litigation of disputes between broker-dealers, their registered representatives and their clients and in defending major manufacturers of juvenile products in their product liability actions across the country.

Opposing counsel have most often complimented John for his tenacious attention to detail. John uses the details to tailor case strategies that have been successful in trial as well as direct settlement negotiation and mediation. For example, one client hired John after losing five straight related cases with another attorney. John developed new defenses that prior counsel had failed to present. These defenses resulted in the client winning three subsequent related cases and favorably settling one more. In another case, John negotiated an innovative settlement by advising his client to accept full responsibility for a quarter-million-dollar tax penalty in exchange for other concessions by the opposing party. Because John was able to convince the IRS to reverse the entire penalty, his client ultimately paid nothing.

John, along with his partner Charles Risch, had similar success in a substantial arbitration brought against one of the world's largest brokerdealers. The claimants' case was supported by a scathing internal memorandum chastising the individual broker for his interactions with clients. After tirelessly studying documents and interviewing witnesses, John chose not to play down the memorandum, but to embrace it. At trial, he identified subtle changes in the broker's subsequent client interactions and reconstructed through testimony the broker-dealer's extensive, but largely undocumented, actions in response to the memorandum that had brought about these changes. Presented with this evidence, the NASD arbitration panel denied all of the claimants' claims and took the unusual step of charging the claimants for all of the costs associated with the 17 days of hearing. The opposing counsel had lined up dozens of similar claims against the same broker and firm, aggregating tens of millions of dollars. Faced with this convincing result, he chose to forgo any further filings.

Through his active membership in the CBA Securities Law Committee, the Defense Research Institute (DRI) and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), John stays current on legal developments and contributes to the ongoing discussion of cutting-edge arguments for his clients. As an example, John authored and presented The Post-Sale Duties to Warn or Recall - Are They Preempted When NHTSA and the CPSC Oversee the Manufacturer's Conduct? (DRI Product Liability Conference) (2001). This article urged litigators to press a creative, but untested, preemption argument. A year later, at a meeting of prominent defense counsel, a speaker credited his successful case result to this innovative defense.

John grew up with 11 sisters and five brothers-honing his skills arguing and mediating between his 16 siblings.

Articles & Presentations

12/2011, Outside Business Activity, Practical Compliance and Risk Management for the Securities Industry, November-December 2011

5/2009, Outside Business Activity (Part 3 of 3), NSCP Currents, March/April 2009

3/2009, Outside Business Activity (Part 2 of 3), NSCP Currents, January/February 2009

1/1/2009, Outside Business Activity (Part 1 of 3), NSCP Currents, November/December 2008

10/21/2008, National Society of Compliance Professionals, National Membership Meeting. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

5/1/2006, Mediation of Securities Disputes: Views from the Advocate and the Mediator, American Bar Association, Section of Litigation, Securities Litigation Committee

9/1/2003, Document Retention Requirements of the CPSC/NHTA and Their Discovery Protections, Defense Research Institute Product Liability Conference, Juvenile Products Breakout Session

2/1/2001, "The Post-Sale Duty to Warn and Recall: Are They Preempted When NHTSA or the CPSC Oversees the Manufacturer's Conduct?," Defense Research Institute Products Liability Conference, Juvenile Products Breakout Session

2/1/2000, "State Child Product Safety Acts-The Good News and the Bad," Defense Research Institute Product Liability Conference, Juvenile Products Breakout Session

1/1/1996, Computer Litigation Support Systems, Chapter 6, Business Litigation Handbook, Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education

Experience

Lawrence, Kamin, Saunders & Uhlenhop LLC

- Managing Partner: 2005-Present

- Partner: 2001

- Associate: 1998-2001

Lord, Bissell & Brook, 1994-1998

Honors

Named a 2008 Rising Star

- by Super Lawyers Magazine

Northern Illinois University College of Law

- 2004 Young Alumnus of the Year

American Bar Association

- Illinois Liaison to Committee on State Regulation of Securities 2009-Present

Chicago Bar Association

- Securities Law Committee

- Chair (2010-2011)

- Vice Chair (2009-2010)

- Legislative Liaison (2008-2009)

Defense Research Institute

- Children's Products Specialized

- Litigation Group,

-- Chair (2010-2011)

-- Co-Chair (2007-2010)

Illinois Bar Association

NIU College of Law Board of Visitors

- Chair (2010-2014)

- Vice Chair (2009-2010)

Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Compliance and Legal Division

How John handles litigation matters

John S. Monical, Lawrence Kamin's managing partner, has been with the firm since 1998. His primary area of practice is litigation, including representing the financial services industry in regulatory investigations, arbitration, mediation and litigation of disputes between broker-dealers, their registered representatives and their clients and in defending major manufacturers of juvenile products…

The kind of cases John takes

John reviews new inquiries case-by-case for litigation, product liability, and securities matters in Chicago and the surrounding Illinois area.

Credentials

Education, bar admissions, and languages

  • Northern Illinois University College of Law J.D. magna cum laude Northern Illinois University College of Law J.D. second in class Northern Illinois University College of Law J.D. 1994 Assista

  • University of Illinois, Urbana

    B.S. Computer · 1991

Jurisdictions

John's state bar admissions

  • Wisconsin

    2017 · ACTIVE

  • Indiana United State

    2009 · ACTIVE

  • Illinois

    1994 · ACTIVE

John studied at — in Northern Illinois University College of Law J.D. magna cum laude Northern Illinois University College of Law J.D. second in class Northern Illinois University College of Law J.D. 1994 Assista and B.S. Computer in University of Illinois, Urbana.

Law school and academic background

John completed — in Northern Illinois University College of Law J.D. magna cum laude Northern Illinois University College of Law J.D. second in class Northern Illinois University College of Law J.D. 1994 Assista and B.S. Computer in University of Illinois, Urbana. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice John runs in Illinois is where that training gets applied to real client questions.

Recognition

Recognition and thought leadership

John has received 1 formal recognition from bar associations, industry bodies, and peer-review services.

  • AV Preeminent

Legal awards and honors

AV Preeminent.

Locations

John S. Monical's office in Chicago

John's primary office is at 300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, IL, 60606. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.

Main office

Lawrence Kamin, LLC

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500

Chicago, IL 60606

Open in Google Maps

Client feedback

Client reviews of John S. Monical — 5.0/5 rating from 16 verified client reviews

Every review below is from a verified client of John. Reviews cover communication, case outcome, and value — the three signals that matter most when comparing litigation attorneys in Chicago.

5.0

16 client reviews

Client ratings are sourced from public records and editorial research. Reviews on LawyersListed are accepted from verified clients once John S. Monical claims this profile.

Read all reviews

Hiring guide

How to hire John S. Monical — what to expect in your first consultation

Working with a new litigation attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with John usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.

Consultation formats and pricing

John charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain John's office.

What to bring to your first meeting

Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; John will tell you what matters and what doesn't.

Questions to ask a litigation attorney in Chicago, Illinois

A short list to run through before you commit: How many litigation matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?

Fees & payment

Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for John

John discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in litigation practice — ask which fits.

Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options

Every litigation matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. John confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.

Payment methods and payment plans

John's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many litigation practices work with clients on structured schedules.

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about John S. Monical

  • How much does it cost to hire John for a litigation case?

    Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. John walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.

  • Does John offer a free consultation?

    John charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain John's office. Some litigation attorneys offer free consults — check John's current terms during booking.

  • How long do litigation cases in Illinois typically take?

    Simple litigation matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. John gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.

  • Can John take my case if I'm outside Chicago?

    John is licensed in Illinois. Matters governed by Illinois law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — John will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.

  • What should I bring to my first meeting with John?

    Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. John will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.

  • Is John accepting new litigation clients right now?

    John's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.

Areas served

Litigation attorneys serving Chicago, Springfield and Northbrook in Illinois

John handles litigation matters throughout Illinois. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified litigation attorneys in that community.

More counsel

If John's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these litigation attorneys in Chicago handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.