
Patrick M. DeLong, Construction Attorney in Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Over 33 years of legal practice · focused on Construction, Consumer, and General · 4.3/5 rating from 3 verified client reviews
Co-Chair, Rideshare Litigation Practice Group, ShareholderatMarshall Dennehey
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Practicing construction in Fort Lauderdale since 1993.
- 33+
- Years practicing
- 4.3 ★
- 3 client reviews
- 4
- Bar admissions
Practices in
Are you Patrick M. DeLong?
This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.
Quick answer
Patrick M. DeLong is a co-chair, rideshare litigation practice group, shareholder based in Fort Lauderdale, FL. The practice focuses on Construction, Consumer, and General. Patrick has over 33 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Marshall Dennehey. Rated 4.3 out of 5 from 3 client reviews.
- Based in
- Fort Lauderdale, FL
- Experience
- over 33 years
- Known for
- Construction · Consumer · General
- Handles Construction, Consumer, and General matters from Fort Lauderdale, FL.
- Over 33 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
- Recognized with BV Distinguished.
About Patrick M. DeLong: Patrick M. DeLong is a co-chair, rideshare litigation practice group, shareholder based in Fort Lauderdale, FL. The practice focuses on Construction, Consumer, and General. Patrick has over 33 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Marshall Dennehey. Rated 4.3 out of 5 from 3 client reviews.
Areas of practice
Patrick's practice areas in Fort Lauderdale
Patrick concentrates on construction, consumer, general, litigation, and business. Each area below outlines the kind of case Patrick handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.
Construction
View other Construction attorneys
Consumer
View other Consumer attorneys
General
View other General attorneys
Litigation
View other Litigation attorneys
Business
View other Business attorneys
Construction cases in Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Patrick takes construction matters in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Patrick agrees to represent you.
Consumer cases in Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Patrick takes consumer matters in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Patrick agrees to represent you.
General cases in Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Patrick takes general matters in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Patrick agrees to represent you.
Litigation cases in Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Patrick takes litigation matters in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Patrick agrees to represent you.
Business cases in Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Patrick takes business matters in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Patrick agrees to represent you.
Biography
Patrick M. DeLong, construction attorney serving Fort Lauderdale
Patrick M. DeLong is a co-chair, rideshare litigation practice group, shareholder based in Fort Lauderdale, FL. The practice focuses on Construction, Consumer, and General. Patrick has over 33 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Marshall Dennehey. Rated 4.3 out of 5 from 3 client reviews. Patrick works from Fort Lauderdale, Florida and takes on construction matters across the region.
As a member of the Casualty Department, Patrick represents clients and their insurers in high exposure automobile negligence, uninsured motorist, premises liability, commercial general liability and construction site accident cases involving allegations of wrongful death and catastrophic injuries in both Florida and federal courts.
Patrick focuses a portion of his practice on a recently emerging area of law-the defense of rideshare liability cases. In this capacity, he develops strategies for successfully defending rideshare drivers and their insurers in complex, catastrophic rideshare negligence and uninsured motorist cases throughout the State of Florida.
Additionally, Patrick represents clients in complex construction defect, and building design related claims and suits. He routinely represents and defends real estate developers, general contractors, subcontractors, licensed construction industry professionals, as well as municipalities, in all manner of construction related actions.
Since joining the firm in 2013, Patrick has defended creditors and debt servicers in creditors’ rights, TCPA, FDCPA and FCCPA actions.
In 1990, Patrick earned his Bachelor of Arts degree with Honors from the University of Notre Dame, and remained at the University of Notre Dame for law school where he received is juris doctor in 1993. Patrick is a member of the Bar of the state of Florida. He is admitted to practice before all Florida state circuit and federal district courts, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern and Middle District of Florida, as well as the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Classes/Seminars Taught
•The Complexity of Rideshare Claims, AM Best Insurance Law Podcast, June 2021
•Preserving Evidence and Avoiding Spoliation in Florida, Marshall Dennehey Florida Claims Symposium - The Best Defense is a Good Offense, Orlando, FL, September 17, 2014
Published Works
•'Defending Ride-Hailing and Car-Sharing Claims: Handling Accident-Related Lawsuits in a Sharing Economy,' CLM Magazine, January 2022
Thought Leadership
Defense Digest
On the Pulse...Our Rideshare Liability Practice Group
March 1, 2023
Meeting the Needs of the Rideshare RevolutionIn a relatively short timespan, rideshare platforms-like Uber and Lyft-and carshare platforms-like Turo-have transformed the global transportation industry. With the push of a few buttons, users can instantly hail a ride or rent a vehicle virtually anywhere in the world. Unquestionably, the advent of these technology service companies has made travel more convenient and efficient. But it has also spawned a multitude of new legal issues and claims. Legislators and judges have been striving to keep up with the technology, but every legislative or judicial action can create new and complex legal questions. Marshall Dennehey responded to the needs of the industry by forming its Rideshare Liability Practice Group-a dedicated team of experienced defense attorneys who have developed specialized knowledge of legal issues facing this revolutionary industry.Originally launched in 2021, the Rideshare Liability Practice Group is on the cutting edge of defending a wide variety of rideshare claims and peer-to-peer carshare claims. The practice group is comprised of numerous attorneys across the firm’s 19 offices-located in seven different states, including Pennsylvania, Florida, New Jersey, Ohio, New York, Connecticut, and Delaware-who have handled hundreds of claims in the field. The practice group is co-chaired by Thomas F. Brown (Orlando) and Patrick M. Delong (Fort Lauderdale), who cumulatively have over 50 years of insurance defense experience.The attorneys in this practice group have worked with multiple rideshare and carshare platforms. They appreciate the need for understanding the vocabulary of the industry as well as issues of confidentiality and brand protection. Using the wrong terminology could create exposure or liability where it would not otherwise exist. During the course of discovery, a company’s intellectual property and proprietary data might be requested. The attorneys in this group frequently oppose discovery requests that seek proprietary and trade-secret information, and they utilize confidentiality agreements and protective orders to shield confidential information from improper use and widespread disclosure. Appropriate provisions in settlement agreements are also used to protect sensitive information.The Rideshare Liability Practice Group also has extensive experience defending the insurers and users of these platforms, including drivers, vehicle owners, and vehicle renters. They have successfully defended claims involving catastrophic injuries, wrongful death, multiple-vehicle accidents, and multiple claimants. They have staved off aggressive and creative attempts by the plaintiff’s bar to expand liability through causes of action, including:NegligenceVicarious liabilityNegligent hiring or selectionNegligent retention and supervisionProduct liabilityNegligent design of the ride-hailing applicationNegligent maintenance of a shared carNegligent entrustmentBad faithUninsured and underinsured motoristDefending these cases requires the knowledge and an understanding of applicable federal and state laws and regulations. The laws and regulations of a particular state might govern the level of insurance coverage required during various aspects of the rideshare process. An independent rideshare driver might need his or her own insurance while the rideshare app is off. The rideshare platform might be required to provide a coverage when an independent rideshare driver is using the app, but a different amount of coverage might be required depending on whether the driver has accepted a ride or if the driver is actively transporting a rider.Formulating appropriate defenses to these claims also requires an understanding of the applicable law. For example, Florida trial courts have issued conflicting opinions regarding whether a transportation network application is a product subject to product liability laws or a service outside the scope of such laws. Since the Florida appellate courts have not yet weighed in with a controlling opinion on the issue, a rideshare defense practitioner must possess a cutting-edge awareness of developing discovery trends and legal arguments advanced by the plaintiff’s bar with respect to this issue and must prepare his or her client to successfully defend against them during the discovery and dispositive motion phases of litigation.Another example of evolving legal trends may be found in the carshare arena, where both state and federal law could insulate the vehicle owner from liability. The Graves Amendment is a federal law that bars vicarious liability claims where:The owner (or an affiliate of the owner) is engaged in the trade or business of renting or leasing motor vehicles; andThere is no negligence or criminal wrongdoing on the part of the owner (or an affiliate of the owner).Several states have now enacted peer-to-peer carsharing statutes that expressly extend the Graves Amendment to carsharing situations.There are numerous complexities to defending a rideshare or carshare claim, and the attorneys in Marshall Dennehey’s Rideshare Liability Practice Group can be retained to assist at different stages throughout the life of a claim. Before a lawsuit is filed, our rideshare defense attorneys are often asked to assist with accident investigations, preservation of evidence, expert retention, legal research, global settlement conferences, and responding to time-limit demands. Marshall Dennehey’s lawyers have the experience and skill to take cases to trial and are also supported by an exceptional appellate group. In the Marshall Dennehey Rideshare Liability Practice Group, the aim is to always provide outstanding, efficient, and cost-conscious legal services to our clients.*Patrick DeLong is a shareholder in our Fort Lauderdale, Florida, office. He can be reached at 954.832.3953 or pmdelong@mdwcg.com. Tom Brown is a shareholder in our Orlando, Florida, office. He can be reached at 407.420.4392 or tfbrown@mdwcg.com. Defense Digest, Vol. 29, No. 1, March 2023, is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. 2023 Marshall Dennehey. All Rights Reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. For reprints, contact tamontemuro@mdwcg.com.
Defending Ride-Hailing and Car-Sharing Claims
January 1, 2022
The sharing economy has grown exponentially in a short period of time. Rideshare platforms like Uber and Lyft, and car-sharing platforms like Turo, control a significant part of the sharing economy space.Along with this rapid growth came insurance programs for ridesharing and car-sharing platforms, as well as a surge of claims and lawsuits against them, their users, and their insurers.
Patrick's approach to construction cases
As a member of the Casualty Department, Patrick represents clients and their insurers in high exposure automobile negligence, uninsured motorist, premises liability, commercial general liability and construction site accident cases involving allegations of wrongful death and catastrophic injuries in both Florida and federal courts. Patrick focuses a portion of his practice on a recently emerging…
The kind of cases Patrick takes
Patrick reviews new inquiries case-by-case for construction, consumer, and general matters in Fort Lauderdale and the surrounding Florida area.
Credentials
Credentials — where Patrick studied and practices
Notre Dame Law School
J.D. · 1993
University of Notre Dame
B.A. · 1990
Jurisdictions
Patrick's state bar admissions
U.S District Court,
2000 · ACTIVE
U.S District Court,
2000 · ACTIVE
U.S District Court,
1994 · ACTIVE
Florida
1993 · ACTIVE
Patrick studied at J.D. in Notre Dame Law School and B.A. in University of Notre Dame.
Law school and academic background
Patrick completed J.D. in Notre Dame Law School and B.A. in University of Notre Dame. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Patrick runs in Florida is where that training gets applied to real client questions.
Recognition
Patrick's legal honors and published work
Patrick has received 1 formal recognition from bar associations, industry bodies, and peer-review services.
BV Distinguished
Legal awards and honors
BV Distinguished.
Affiliations
Patrick's professional memberships and bar associations
Associations & memberships ACA International
The Association of Credit and Collection Professionals) NCBA (The National Creditors Bar Association · membership
Locations
Patrick M. DeLong's office in Fort Lauderdale
Patrick's primary office is at 100 Northeast 3rd Avenue, Suite 1100, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33301. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.
Marshall Dennehey
100 Northeast 3rd Avenue, Suite 1100
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Open in Google MapsClient feedback
Client reviews of Patrick M. DeLong — 4.3/5 rating from 3 verified client reviews
Every review below is from a verified client of Patrick. Reviews cover communication, case outcome, and value — the three signals that matter most when comparing construction attorneys in Fort Lauderdale.
4.3
3 client reviews
Client ratings are sourced from public records and editorial research. Reviews on LawyersListed are accepted from verified clients once Patrick M. DeLong claims this profile.
Read all reviewsHiring guide
How to hire Patrick M. DeLong — what to expect in your first consultation
Working with a new construction attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Patrick usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.
Consultation formats and pricing
Patrick charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Patrick's office.
What to bring to your first meeting
Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Patrick will tell you what matters and what doesn't.
Questions to ask a construction attorney in Fort Lauderdale, Florida
A short list to run through before you commit: How many construction matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?
Fees & payment
Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Patrick
Patrick discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in construction practice — ask which fits.
Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options
Every construction matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Patrick confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.
Payment methods and payment plans
Patrick's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many construction practices work with clients on structured schedules.
Frequently asked
Frequently asked questions about Patrick M. DeLong
How much does it cost to hire Patrick for a construction case?
Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Patrick walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.
Does Patrick offer a free consultation?
Patrick charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Patrick's office. Some construction attorneys offer free consults — check Patrick's current terms during booking.
How long do construction cases in Florida typically take?
Simple construction matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Patrick gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.
Can Patrick take my case if I'm outside Fort Lauderdale?
Patrick is licensed in Florida. Matters governed by Florida law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Patrick will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.
What should I bring to my first meeting with Patrick?
Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Patrick will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.
Is Patrick accepting new construction clients right now?
Patrick's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.
Areas served
Construction attorneys serving Fort Lauderdale, Miami and Tampa in Florida
Patrick handles construction matters throughout Florida. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified construction attorneys in that community.
- Fort Lauderdale6,726 attorneys
- Miami15,918 attorneys
- Tampa9,739 attorneys
- Orlando7,352 attorneys
- Jacksonville5,497 attorneys
- Tallahassee4,383 attorneys
- West Palm Beach3,699 attorneys
- Boca Raton3,668 attorneys
- Coral Gables3,397 attorneys
- Naples2,155 attorneys
- St Petersburg2,098 attorneys
- Sarasota1,994 attorneys
More counsel
Other top-rated construction attorneys in Florida
If Patrick's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these construction attorneys in Fort Lauderdale handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.





